Great Depression of 2016

[Bluebonnet]

I spent a good year looking for the land that met my needs. I had a vision of what I wanted and I had to check local laws before deciding on area where I wanted to settle down. I had to invest a good deal in clearing the land to make it suitable for what I wanted, but I am glad I went through the extra leg work to make this happen.

Government policies have made farming unprofitable for many, except for mass production. They also had a healthy hand in creating GMOs. Check out the history of Agent Orange and Monsanto and follow the money. For a worse shock, check out how our own government conducted illegal human experimentation on its own citizens without their knowledge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

Where is this magical place, that is so quiet, that roosters should not be allowed to sully the silence? Farmers and roosters came before other, far more common and widespread noise makers. If this is about rights, what about the rights of Americans to maintain a traditional lifestyle, that was once the norm, without exception across the United States?

Some places have restrictions, but my point is that such restrictions should not be there in the first place.

Being able to be secure in your person and possessions, as well as secure in your food supply and traditional American way of life should be held higher than a noise complaint.

Why do the Amish, who have a religious cause to back their traditional ways, hold more weight than any other American, who wishes to maintain the traditional lifestyle of our ancestors?

Why should we need an exception or excuse to own a rooster?

The concept is completely ridiculous to me.

 

[Zarn]

This debate has been ongoing for years... Do you think the government will ever serve the people? Quite frankly I am tired of our government. Everything they touch is non profitable and corrupt. Yet we keep electing them and all we do is complain. The time for complaining is done it's time we take control of our country before someone else does.

 

[Dwkuska]

The low income in this country are still in the top 1% of the world. So how does it feel to be a 1 percenter ?

Considering what I have seen around the world, and the utter nonesense from the "99%ers" ... I feel pretty good lol

This debate has been ongoing for years... Do you think the government will ever serve the people? Quite frankly I am tired of our government. Everything they touch is non profitable and corrupt. Yet we keep electing them and all we do is complain. The time for complaining is done it's time we take control of our country before someone else does.

Regarding profitablility... war is VERY profitable to the business of the US, its just that the govt. spends so much thats what makes it seem unprofitable. As far as taking control... in the US we "tale control" by voting in officials who best serve our own personal beliefs so I guess I dont understand what your suggesting. Anything beyond that could be construed as sedition. Dangers grounds my friend be very careful way you think out loud.

 

[Bluebonnet]

This debate has been ongoing for years... Do you think the government will ever serve the people? Quite frankly I am tired of our government. Everything they touch is non profitable and corrupt. Yet we keep electing them and all we do is complain. The time for complaining is done it's time we take control of our country before someone else does.

Do you think my generation is capable? Look around, they are too pacified to defend their own interests. I find it shameful.

We have become so much less competitive than our ancestors were.

I do not expect our government to do anything but use the American People to line their own pocketbooks, as has been true since the invention of government.

I'm not for anarchy, I just wish we could get back to what our Founding Father's intended for us, because what we have now is not it.

They gave us the answer of what is required for change, but no one wants to suffer or go against our corrupt government, because of the risk involved.

All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for good men to do nothing, so the cycle continues to repeat.

It is bad news all around.

 

[Bluebonnet]

Considering what I have seen around the world, and the utter nonesense from the "99%ers" ... I feel pretty good lol

Regarding profitablility... war is VERY profitable to the business of the US, its just that the govt. spends so much thats what makes it seem unprofitable. As far as taking control... in the US we "tale control" by voting in officials who best serve our own personal beliefs so I guess I dont understand what your suggesting. Anything beyond that could be construed as sedition. Dangers grounds my friend be very careful way you think out loud.

Sedition? Just what did you think our Founding Father's were talking about in the Declaration of Independence?

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.





It is possible that our corrupt government no longer has our best interests at heart. They trade the dead bodies of our men and women for millions in their savings accounts as they profit from the war machine.

I'm sure there are plenty of homeless vets right now, with severe conflict injuries, both physical and mental, who are neglected and out on the street at this very moment. Do you think they feel like their best interests are being represented by our government?

Let us hope it never comes to that, but do not be too much of a coward to realize that otherwise might just become necessary to protect the interests of you and your descendants.

When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty. ~ Thomas Jefferson

 

[Dwkuska]

lol not sure if you pay much attention to the gun world by DHS just bought 2 billion rounds of ammuniton, a few shotguns, 2million rounds of AK-47 rounds and 200,000 ak-47 magazines(oddly enough except the occasional SF unit the us doesnt use AK-47). To top this off many local, state, and federal agencies are making attempts to ban firearms and organized demonstrations. Thank you Patriot Act for allowing violations of our constitutional rights in the name of national security(or government officials security rather)
\
Also consider all those people on the far left who believe the govt. is the answer and the millions of folks on welfare,SSI, govt assistance. They arent going to risk their livelyhood in the name of liberty and justice for all.

 

[hemet dennis]

I spent a good year looking for the land that met my needs. I had a vision of what I wanted and I had to check local laws before deciding on area where I wanted to settle down. I had to invest a good deal in clearing the land to make it suitable for what I wanted, but I am glad I went through the extra leg work to make this happen.

Government policies have made farming unprofitable for many, except for mass production. They also had a healthy hand in creating GMOs. Check out the history of Agent Orange and Monsanto and follow the money. For a worse shock, check out how our own government conducted illegal human experimentation on its own citizens without their knowledge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

Where is this magical place, that is so quiet, that roosters should not be allowed to sully the silence? Farmers and roosters came before other, far more common and widespread noise makers. If this is about rights, what about the rights of Americans to maintain a traditional lifestyle, that was once the norm, without exception across the United States?
You really don't think the person that wants to not live next to a farm has that right ?

Some places have restrictions, but my point is that such restrictions should not be there in the first place.

Being able to be secure in your person and possessions, as well as secure in your food supply and traditional American way of life should be held higher than a noise complaint.
You have the right to make that choice. But you don't have the right to make someone else's choice.

Why do the Amish, who have a religious cause to back their traditional ways, hold more weight than any other American, who wishes to maintain the traditional lifestyle of our ancestors?

Why should we need an exception or excuse to own a rooster?

The concept is completely ridiculous to me.
Sorry that you don't believe in freedom of choice.

 

[Bluebonnet]

I'm extremely pro-common sense.

Such persons have a right to purchase land, just like farmers do, to insulate themselves from the real world, as they are trying to do by being prohibitive to roosters.

Farming is a historical profession and way of life.

Would you expect anyone moving next door to a mega mall should be entitled to the same anti-noise as those against roosters? Why just rooster noise?

See what an unreasonable expectation that is?

 

[Dwkuska]

Hemet.. your defense is peoples rights... IF you really believe in peoples rights then your argument is self defeating. If everyone "Has" the right.. then nobody has any rights. Does that make sense? Its impossible to make everyone happy. If you find a rooster to be a violation of your rights or anyone elses on the merit of noise polution than I would question where you live. As previously stated there are many more things in todays modern society that make much more noise then a rooster.

"You have the right to make that choice. But you don't have the right to make someone else's choice."

If you have the right to make that choice then de facto you are making that choice for someone else... If I buy property and have a choice to raise a rooster then I am denying my neighbors the choice of whether or not they want to live next to a rooster. Your argument as such doesnt hold up. Perphaps if you elaborate or re-word it, I could understand your reasoning.

 

[Bluebonnet]

Regarding the subject at hand, the good times, the bad times and the chicken.

Anyone here have any Depression Era stories regarding chickens?