- Thread starter
- #41
tarajane
Chirping
- Feb 8, 2015
- 129
- 5
- 63
But it is far easier to start with a breed of dog that already has innate, instinctive tendencies toward protectiveness. I have a Rat Terrier. I'm a pretty good dog trainer. I can honestly say it would not be worth my while to try and train my Rat Terrier to do the kind of work that would come (generally) very naturally for many Great Pyrenees or other LGDs. That is not to say that he couldn't do it, but I would have a tough row to hoe trying to overcome his instinctive natural tendencies to sniff out and hunt vermin. I could spend long hours training him to perform the behaviors and go through the motions, but you can't train in that instinctive need/desire/drive to do them. With all the training in the world I still expect that if I put my RT out with the flock with no supervision or guided direction from me, every one of my birds could be taken by a predator while he was busy ridding the woodpile of mice. That is far less likely to occur with a LGD who received the same amount of training. Likewise, I expect it would be very difficult to try and train that GP to completely ignore a flock of sheep and instead focus on hunting and killing rats. Different breeds are more capable than others of doing different work. Humans have spent centuries making sure that this is so. It's the whole reason we even have different breeds.
One also can't ignore that fact that even the most protective Chihuahua is still no match for a coyote. There are other considerations beyond temperament and instinctive drives that make certain breeds more appropriate for certain jobs.
Touch'e

Last edited: