Quote:
I don't see the problem here. Shouldn't owning a gun legally be reasonably similar to owning a car, another potentially deadly weapon that can be stolen and used to injure others or for illicit/illegal acts?
How to track the proposed legislation, which will never pass anyway.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45
Ok, somebody explain how in reference, that the fact of driving is relavant to owning a gun. Ill go through a few points:
1. yes a car can be stolen as well as a gun. Good point
2. a car was never referenced in the 2cnd ammendment. It talks about maintaning a militia for the security of a free state. Hence- firearms.
3. a car does not & should not have even been mentioned in any relation to what this bill is trying to do. This bill should not be even entertained in HR and is such, a travisty. This is a steadfast fact and a BINDING law and no it's not an "old Piece of paper", it is still in effect. for those that don't know, im talking about the
2cnd ammendment. I won't quote again, due to
buckeye daves already doing it, and very well might i add. This is a topic of very that is percieved by the "higher ups" as grey area. But if you put this to someone who has done military time, understands fully how to handle and safeguard firearms, and hold true to themselves the basis of what the 2cnd amendment was trying to instill, this is a very hot topic. I would advise other BYCers here that if you decide to comment on this, to choose you're words wisely because this topics will blow up fast.