My thought process is as follows:
if it is so obvious, why not list the reason why?
If one should clearly know to wait the "recommended" time, what is that time-and what are the reasons/precautions in waiting/incubating?
I respect opinions, but to opine as opposed to inform is not always beneficial.
Would I eat eggs with a hen on antibiotics? - NO, I would wait. Because the antibiotics WILL be out of the system. It is not permanent in the bodies.
In my case, these chickens are pets and not good egg/meat producers, so I do not necessarily see a reason to not do it. Afterall, many women take antibiotics while pregnant and don't throw their babies away. I would never needlessly medicate a flock for prevention, but am I to believe that if ones child was diagnosed with a bacterial infection that one would deny antibiotics? (doesn't seem likely..)
Just saying...I am looking for a "why/why not." I appreciate opinions and experiences, and even respect those who acknowledge that they have no idea, and are just trying to help; but for the others who make a claim that one should/ought do something is only beneficial if one has evidence or information as to why one ought to do such a thing. (especially when an implication of known knowledge exists...it's just the only way it helps.)
not everything is obvious, if that was the case...what is anyone doing in a community forum for information at all?