Interesting thought, and thanks for the post. It's definitely an issue with many of the White Rocks, to be sure, however. We've talked about it ad nauseum on this thread and others, have gone round & round about why judges place them when they are so far over standard in weight, Walt has replied that judges don't have the time to weigh each bird, and a good judge will know by the feel anyway...also, that if they get "too" large, it will take care of itself naturally since difficulty in breeding will result, etc. I personally think a huge bird is GORGEOUS - I have Jersey Giants that are very, very large. So, it's not that I'm against a big bird and, in fact, they are my preference.Since quote isn't working, in response to Wynette's post about size. It is entirely possible for a bird to be "massive" and still be within tolerances of standard. Certainly no one would hesitate to call my Langshan male massive, and indeed he's huge in stature. Bigger than any White Rock you'll see. Yet he is barely standard weight. Why do I use the comparison? Standard weight for a Rock and a Langshan are either the same or very close (my standard is home I'm at work).
Edit: standard also says that in large fowl all else being equal the larger bird is to be preferred (of course with the caveat that over 20% overweight technically being a DQ)

I do agree!Colburg.....I'm with you. As long as I can afford to feed 'em, I just can't see raising "chicken nuggets" (in all sincerity, no offense to those of you that do).....but I like my BIG birds
I have 2 Columbian rock Ks right now that are slightly over 10 lbs