I edited Joseph's wonderful post for the sake of space and wanted to reference the above highlighted portion.Prepotency is and excellent conversation and very appropriate to this thread!
....
Eventually one risks getting a cockerel that is homozygous for all of the necessary parts and that has a very high level of quantitative modifiers to pass around. His offspring are like BAM, because he is a genetic powerhouse. He can make up for the failings of his mates because of his homozygous prepotency and high volume of quantitative modifiers. Now, in theory, a hen can also be prepotent, but she will always be at the disadvantage when it comes to any sex-linked quality because a hen can only pass on a sex-linked quality to male offspring whereas a male can pass on a sex-linked quality to both male and female chicks. Also, the prepotent male is particularly valuable because it can be so easily spread about in the breeding pen(s).
.....
I would like to ask if the example of 3rivers' (Karen's) decrease in the quality of pullets from her Sussex breeding this year (Karen, please correct me if I am remembering this wrong, but I think I recall that you said your pullets from this year were narrower than your original hens), could be because the cock bird is lacking and the hens (unable to contribute to the pullets) are not responsible for the narrowing she is experiencing? Also, would breeding the hens back to a son be a way to find out if the hens are the problem? Would pullets mated back to the cock show if he was the problem?