Just a thought that came to mind...
Many heritage breeds are cold hardy, take heat well enough (as long as you give them shade and water), and free range well enough.
Do you think mutt chickens would be more hardy?
Or could you Rhode Islanders or Plymouths (or any breed really become more hardy has the generations pass?
Or would it be the same?
What do you think?
Thanks for your insight.
It's not quite as simple as one might like, or believe.
What traits would you want that fall under the general term hardy.
Fighting cocks were bred to be hardy, so are the land race breeds people try to increase the population of.
Does hardy mean to you long lived, or able to withstand climate extremes or something else?
The really odd part is, nature has all this sorted and what humans tend to do with their very limited understanding of what makes one chicken survive and another not is mess it up.
People who breed chickens do by and large breed by looks. They do this because the genetics involved have obvious results and are easy to understand.
It's partly why we have so many pretty not very good at very much chicken breeds.
So, step one is to know what you want from the breed. You won't be wanting Buff Orpingtons for example if you want a fast and agile chicken.
How will you know which breed or cross breed is able to survive and live to a ripe old age without waiting around for a decade for each generation to achieve it's maximum potential?
There's some good news. If you let the chickens decide who breeds with who and nature kill off the least adaptable, you're likely to get a far better result than any short term breeding program.