- Apr 25, 2015
- 4,657
- 3,311
- 407
I agree with you Banty, it would then be an Ameracauna. Not an Easter Egger
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know, most people on BYC feel a bird is a breed if it looks like it, not based on lineage. One could take birds of Easter Egger lineage, and show them as Ameraucanas. Say I had a White Wyandotte with a single comb, but both of its parents were shown as White Wyandottes, that had Plymouth Rock type. Would it be A White Wyandotte or a White Plymouth Rock? What if one bred Production Reds to fit the Rhode Island Red Standard. Would they become Rhode Island Reds?I'm not getting you. That would make them Ameraucanas, not Easter Eggers.![]()
Show me a bird of direct hatchery EE heritage that looks like a SOP Ameraucana and I'll eat my hat, lol.I know, most people on BYC feel a bird is a breed if it looks like it, not based on lineage. One could take birds of Easter Egger lineage, and show them as Ameraucanas.
This is a oft-repeated question that has two answers in my opinion. What are you doing with the bird? Purely showing, or are you a breeder that aims to improve upon your stock? If you just show and don't give a rat's rear about improving the breed then you "could" say it was a White Plymouth Rock and show and win as such.Say I had a White Wyandotte with a single comb, but both of its parents were shown as White Wyandottes, that had Plymouth Rock type. Would it be A White Wyandotte or a White Plymouth Rock? What if one bred Production Reds to fit the Rhode Island Red Standard. Would they become Rhode Island Reds?
If both of a birds parents are purebred of one breed that is also what there offspring is no matter what they look like. Again I agree with everything Banty saidI know, most people on BYC feel a bird is a breed if it looks like it, not based on lineage. One could take birds of Easter Egger lineage, and show them as Ameraucanas. Say I had a White Wyandotte with a single comb, but both of its parents were shown as White Wyandottes, that had Plymouth Rock type. Would it be A White Wyandotte or a White Plymouth Rock? What if one bred Production Reds to fit the Rhode Island Red Standard. Would they become Rhode Island Reds?
That is in no way correct for showing in a class other than in showmanship. I can get many people to agree with me also. An easter egger could never be shown, in an APA/ABA or most shows in fact, and place.
As for my example, even with proper conditioning the hatchery would never place over mine, I can also get many people to agree with me on that.
The flaws in my bird is she needs more lacing, and a better comb and face.
I find no positives in the hatchery quality, other then maybe a little of its coloring but it is very uneven
Also agree, though the AM people won't. I think it's still a bad quality specimen of xxx breed, not transformed into a mutt by phenotype alone.that is also what there offspring is no matter what they look like.
If both of a birds parents are purebred of one breed that is also what there offspring is no matter what they look like. Again I agree with everything Banty said
Could be shown, yes, if you managed to get a bird that looks like SOP.So if both parents are Easter Eggers, the bird is still an Easter Eggers then. But, it could be shown as an Ameraucana.
Yes. So it could not be shown as an ameracauna because it is not one. Even if it looks like oneSo if both parents are Easter Eggers, the bird is still an Easter Eggers then. But, it could be shown as an Ameraucana.