Quote:
Those businesses were already in place- they're called Oil Companies, Recyclers and Auto Manufacturers.
So-called "global warming" has been shot full of so many holes, they had to start calling it "climate change".
Everyone can sit here and post links to bolster their theories and the links are no better than what the person's opinion are who wrote them. The internet, wikipedia and what have you are not Gospel and every source of information is completely manipulated to assist your arrival to the author's conclusion.
A little common sense is in order regarding global warming. Just the fact it has been spun and repackaged over the past two years should tell you it's pure charlatainism.
Seriously, I laughed reading that your arguments to disprove a theory are "Everyone can sit here and post links to bolster their theories and the links are no better than what the person's opinion are who wrote them."
And, at the same time you say "So-called "global warming" has been shot full of so many holes, they had to start calling it "climate change".", seriously, how does someone can get this conclusion from, other then their opinion?
This perfectly illustrates my point, you read what you want to read to help you reach your desired conclusion. If enough people said climate change was caused by drinking too much tea in China, someone would figure out a way to make money off of that theory and someone would figure out a way to make it look legitimate.
Just say no to the Kool-Aid.
Those businesses were already in place- they're called Oil Companies, Recyclers and Auto Manufacturers.
So-called "global warming" has been shot full of so many holes, they had to start calling it "climate change".
Everyone can sit here and post links to bolster their theories and the links are no better than what the person's opinion are who wrote them. The internet, wikipedia and what have you are not Gospel and every source of information is completely manipulated to assist your arrival to the author's conclusion.
A little common sense is in order regarding global warming. Just the fact it has been spun and repackaged over the past two years should tell you it's pure charlatainism.
Seriously, I laughed reading that your arguments to disprove a theory are "Everyone can sit here and post links to bolster their theories and the links are no better than what the person's opinion are who wrote them."
And, at the same time you say "So-called "global warming" has been shot full of so many holes, they had to start calling it "climate change".", seriously, how does someone can get this conclusion from, other then their opinion?
This perfectly illustrates my point, you read what you want to read to help you reach your desired conclusion. If enough people said climate change was caused by drinking too much tea in China, someone would figure out a way to make money off of that theory and someone would figure out a way to make it look legitimate.
Just say no to the Kool-Aid.