Quote:
I think what would help is if breeders made a move to advertise that their cameos are proven to come from birds that aren't turning white. If that means holding off on breeding for a couple of years, well, that might be what the breeders need to do if they want to clean their lines. But it's something that will have to be voluntary. There needs to be an incentive for doing so, perhaps some sort of certification that can be provided by the UPA? I know that many dog breeders advertise that their dogs have passed hip and other health/physiology tests.
The Eurasier dog breeders go a step further in requiring health tests of breeder dogs before their pups can be registered with the breed club. If peafowl breeders are able to go through their cameo lines and be sure that their breeders don't have the trait, and they advertise their stock as being free of the trait, perhaps buyers would be willing to pay a little more for birds that come from these breeders. If people with birds that turned blind were able to donate the birds for research, perhaps a diagnostic test could be made to determine if the bird shows the signs of turning blind in the future, before it ever actually goes blind (or starts turning white). Maybe even the specific gene(s) responsible could be found, and a blood test can be developed to check the birds before they show the trait.
With cockatiels, there was an incentive for breeders to produce birds that lacked the bald spot. Many (but not all) breeders raise birds for show, and show-winning stock warranted higher prices for chicks. This sort of dribbled down into the pet sector, decreasing the frequency of the baldness trait. True, cockatiels show the trait earlier, and have shorter generation times, so the process happened faster. But it's not impossible with peafowl. It's just going to take a concerted effort on the part of breeders -- and maybe some encouragement from the UPA.
Why not grant a sort of certification for breeders that meet a standard for breeding practice set forth by the UPA? Encourage banding of chicks with traceable bands in the breeding practice. Those breeders who comply with the standards set forth by the UPA can advertise their chicks as meeting these standards, and thus offer a superior product that can be priced accordingly. There has to be some sort of incentive beyond "the good of the peafowl" for encouraging this -- in other words, a financial incentive. It could be like the difference between a regular used car and a "certified pre-owned" car -- costs a little more, but you know it's been checked out.
I don't know how the bands work with peafowl now, but I know that with cage birds, most species' bands are traceable through the maker of the band. A breeder registers a code that is sort of trade-marked to that breeder, and then what follows is a number. When I bought my
amazon parrot Sammy, I was able to contact L&M, the maker of the band, with his code. For a small fee, I was able to trace the purchaser of that band back to the original breeder, and provided my contact information so that I could communicate with the breeder. I was able to find out his true age (I am not Sammy's first owner) and even find out about his parents. If the UPA had a registry (they might already...I don't know) that worked the same way, then a bird that went blind could be traced back to the original parents, and the breeder (who might not even know any of his chicks later turned blind) could make adjustments with his pairs...maybe break up the pair and set the birds up with others, or not breed them anymore at all.
These are just some thoughts from an outsider. I hope this trait doesn't follow Cameos forever.