Quote:
I think your misinterpreting public property. And like I've said before. The park wants the birds gone! And please. Give me an example of this law or regulation that says that they are responsible for the birds. If a domestic bird makes a nest in the roof of your house, and this bird flies into the neighbors window and breaks it. That doesn't make you liable for the damages! But if someone finds that bird drinking from a fountain in their backyard, and they want to keep it, are they stealing from you? No they aren't, that was just a bird that lived in your roof that isn't there anymore. Should you sue? While this sounds off topic, you never owned that bird (You didn't buy it, Care for it, pay it any attention), my local FWS made it clear that FERAL animals are not anyone's property. That being the definition of FERAL. Meaning the ownership laws and migratory and WILD waterfowl protection laws DO NOT apply.The park has stated that the birds are NOT theirs, that they are FERAL, that they are DOMESTIC (with the exception of the hybrid mallards, and canadian geese.), AND that they are a NUISANCE. The park, and the city officials have released statements and posted laws and regulations that say that the release of DOMESTIC WATERFOWL into the WILD is punishable by a fine or jail time.
So what do we have here.
The park doesn't own these birds.
These birds are FERAL and DOMESTIC.
The park is not responsible for them.
The park does not feed them or care for them (feeding is punishable by a fine).
It is illegal to RELEASE said birds.
FWS says its legal.
The birds are a NUISANCE.
The park/lake/city/ officials want them GONE.
I see absolutely no reason why this might be illegal. If anything, they should thank me!
SO WHATS WRONG WITH ASKING >>>>>>>TAKEN ANYTHING THAT IS NOT YOUR IS ILLEGAL UNLESS YOU GET PERMISSION.
ARE YOU READING THIS CORRECTLY? THERE'S NO-ONE TO GET PERMISSION FROM! THEY DON'T OWN THE BIRDS!!!!! I DON'T HAVE TO ASK THEM, I'M NOT GOING TO ASK THEM, AND THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO ASK THEM!!!!