- Oct 7, 2011
- 1,483
- 24
- 143
You completely missed the point of my post (not surprising) I'm financially challenged (at this point in my life) and have no desire to govern. I prefer to be left alone, but instead I have to live according to the standards of the wealthy in power. Thankfully, I am in a more rural area and can function independently better than some, but my point is that being poor wouldn't be as difficult if the wealthy in power let the poor be to figure out how to make life work again.Last time I checked the poor could still vote.
Now having the poor in control of business in this country is like putting a fat kid in charge of making donuts.
The poor in this country with a few exceptions are poor because they are unable to make more money or keep what they have made. It is just a simple fact.
My post had absolutely nothing to do with the poor governing; nevertheless, many are wealthy due to ill gotten gains and are not fit to govern either. I'd rather be governed by a financially challenged human with integrity than a cheat who has zero integrity.