- Thread starter
- #41
Quote:
True about Republican spending; they're mostly hypocrites. However... You're saying we should keep corporate welfare? And I always though cocoa, coffee, and sugar grew a lot better in South American/Caribbean countries. If there weren't protectionist tariffs making South American and Caribbean sugar too expensive, the cost of sugar would go down. If we killed farm subsidies, they would actually have to produce enough to meet demand, rather than get cash they aren't earning.
As for the Dems cutting the deficit...
In light of the past four years, that is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard from you. Also, party of common sense?! "Hmmm... I GOT IT! Let's take cash OUT of the economy, then put it back into the economy and tax it as it passes through! That should work!" (Note: Bush DID request the first bailout; I'm just pointing out that the Dems have just as much of a lack of sense as the Republicans.)
I'm not going to argue with you about the deficit spending Q. The stimulus was to get some jobs created which it did. The health care plan is actually deficit neutral and will save a substantial amount of money over the next 20 years.
If we kill farm subsidies all it will do is raise prices for the end consumer. I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that our farmers were not producing enough. That must be the reason for the bread lines I see everywhere. Our government subsidizes a lot of our food industry which is why we have affordable food. If they have tariffs on sugar that's great. It's not like sugar is something we need here real badly. Besides they should have steep tariffs on ALL imported goods. That might bring some jobs back to America. Then this thread wouldn't even be a topic.
In a civilized country people take care of each other. If you don't have family or church then the burden falls on the government.
By "civilized" I assume you mean decaying and on the verge of complete implosion followed by a break-up, or, in a best-case scenario a severe, crippling depression to correct for Fed interference.
That tax money that made up the stimulus? Taking that destroyed jobs. Far more jobs than it could ever possibly create. As for the tariffs, have you ever heard the phrase "free trade?" Those tariffs prevent us from cheaply importing crops that DO NOT GROW WELL here. The Gulf States and SoCal are really the only ones that can grow sugar, and Southern Florida is one of the only areas that can grow cocoa. Even still, they grow far better in the Caribbean and South America. Farm subsidies ARTIFICIALLY lower prices, which kills the incentive for farmers to produce more; personally, I'd rather have them produce more than to have an illusion of abundance. We had affordable food long before illegal subsidies; we would have it after subsidies as well.
As for your last comment, you left out private charities.
True about Republican spending; they're mostly hypocrites. However... You're saying we should keep corporate welfare? And I always though cocoa, coffee, and sugar grew a lot better in South American/Caribbean countries. If there weren't protectionist tariffs making South American and Caribbean sugar too expensive, the cost of sugar would go down. If we killed farm subsidies, they would actually have to produce enough to meet demand, rather than get cash they aren't earning.
As for the Dems cutting the deficit...
I'm not going to argue with you about the deficit spending Q. The stimulus was to get some jobs created which it did. The health care plan is actually deficit neutral and will save a substantial amount of money over the next 20 years.
If we kill farm subsidies all it will do is raise prices for the end consumer. I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that our farmers were not producing enough. That must be the reason for the bread lines I see everywhere. Our government subsidizes a lot of our food industry which is why we have affordable food. If they have tariffs on sugar that's great. It's not like sugar is something we need here real badly. Besides they should have steep tariffs on ALL imported goods. That might bring some jobs back to America. Then this thread wouldn't even be a topic.
In a civilized country people take care of each other. If you don't have family or church then the burden falls on the government.
By "civilized" I assume you mean decaying and on the verge of complete implosion followed by a break-up, or, in a best-case scenario a severe, crippling depression to correct for Fed interference.
As for your last comment, you left out private charities.