- Thread starter
- #71
- Oct 28, 2014
- 21
- 1
- 31
Hi, JackE. Thanks for chiming in here.There is nothing complex about framing up a Wood's coop. It's basically just two sheds, of different heights hooked together, easy. Your winter coop design, with the idea of trapping warmth over the roosting area. Would instead, trap a bunch of humidity, and probably lead to frostbitten birds. And you can probably add respiratory problems to the list too. There is a reason the roof is slanted the way it is, in a Wood's coop. What you are talking about, is not a good idea. You would HAVE to add some vents to the high part over the roosts. And if you do that, with your design, you would subject your birds to a nice windtunnel in the winter. Read up more on open-air coops, and the hows and whys of the design.
I've read all I can find so far about the open-air coops, and I still don't understand the essentials of air management. Woods spends most of his prose on celebration of the design and on the practicalities of location and construction, and doesn't offer much of the science and theory of the dynamics of the open-air coop, or of the actual management of chickens within them.
I also haven't seen photos or drawings of the inside of a Woods coop that makes it clear to me where to put roosts. When iski123 suggested putting the roost near the highest point, at the side of a simple, shed-roofed box with the bottom half of the tallest wall left open, I realized I'd been sort of assuming that's where the roost would go -- where the air would be warmest, at the highest point.
Would you please try to straighten me out? You seem to have a really good grasp of the fluid dynamics, humidity management, etc. For instance: Where are your roosts, in your Woods coop? Perhaps they're at the back (farthest from open side), so that warm, wet air travels (gently) up and away from the roosting birds? If iski123 and I put our roosts at the back (short end) of a simple shed-roofed coop with the lower half of the tallest wall left open, would our birds be okay?
And, while I think I get it, intuitively, that the Woods coop is superior to just a box with the lower half of one side open, I don't really understand it cognitively. If I understood that better, maybe I'd feel more confident about whether it's worth the extra cost to build a proper Woods coop, or whether less-than-perfect would be good enough. I don't like less-than-perfect, but I'm already a little breathless at how much just the simple box will set me back.
Help?
Thanks for all you've already offered!