- Thread starter
- #31
- Apr 29, 2012
- 55
- 3
- 101
JJRS I totally understood what you meant about clipping the mallards' back toes. Maybe I should just do that, as you hit it spot on: to relieve my apprehension.
My only concern here is that because they are 3-4 weeks old already, the removal of the toe would cause unneeded pain.
DenverDucky, that's a good point about how people may just take ducks from the wild and try to mark them.
jdywntr, I'm thinking that since the ducks are not six weeks old yet, the ducklings do not need to be marked unless they are being sold over six weeks of age.
kswaterfowl, that makes sense about how some domesticated mallards would obviously look different from standard mallards, proving that they were bred, born, and raised in captivity.
It's a tough issue, and even though laws are meant to help, in the case of concerned and responsible duck owners, I think the laws just cause confusion and take away from the fun of duck ownership...

DenverDucky, that's a good point about how people may just take ducks from the wild and try to mark them.
jdywntr, I'm thinking that since the ducks are not six weeks old yet, the ducklings do not need to be marked unless they are being sold over six weeks of age.
kswaterfowl, that makes sense about how some domesticated mallards would obviously look different from standard mallards, proving that they were bred, born, and raised in captivity.
It's a tough issue, and even though laws are meant to help, in the case of concerned and responsible duck owners, I think the laws just cause confusion and take away from the fun of duck ownership...