There's a lot of confusion out there online about how DE works. It seems intuitive that DE cuts the exoskeletons given the apparent sharpness of the particles in EM micrographs, but it doesn't. DE works by adsorption. Think of it as a sponge that wicks away the waxy cuticle that covers the exoskeleton. It's the waxy cuticle that allows the insect to maintain water balance and keeps them from desiccating. The specific chemical composition of the exoskeleton will determine how susceptible a given species or given stage is to desiccation. E.g. the waxy coating of the mealworm larvae exoskeleton is not very susceptible to adsorption by DE but the cuticle of the adult beetle is very much susceptible. The other important variable affecting how DE works is the ambient humidity. For most insects studied, DE is only effective at humidity levels lower than 70%, with increasing effectiveness at lower humidity levels. This makes sense given that the less moisture there is in the air, the harder it will be for the arthropod to maintain water balance and the quicker it will succumb to desiccation. Here's the abstract to the paper that definitively demonstrated that DE works by adsorption and not by cutting or abrasion.
That is very interesting. I have stopped using DE. I never found it to be effective enough to balance out the controversy of using it. I live in Houston where it is extremely humid so maybe that's why I never had any success with it. Thanks for the info.