Member numbers vs. actual user numbers

[Matthew3590]

In the backyarder vs farmer thread there were like 15 people who posted that had less then 100 post and one of them had been here for 2 YEARS and just now did his first post.

 

[PepsNick]

Way to spoil the fun! LOL.

I have noticed a lot of members hardly ever posting anything but auctions, and when they do otherwise, it's always something like "Why don't you buy our new ______???" or "We are selling ______!!!", you know? I mean, really, people?

 

[Gerry2011]

We (my DH and I) belong to a hiking club that 50% of the members that pay their dues each year have never gone on a hike or attended a meeting and many of those pay for life time memberships. Guess it's a case of just supporting an activity. I am a new member and read (or lurk) lots and lots of threads (my DH thinks I'm permanently stuck in my 'puter chair

), but at this point don't feel I have much to contribute. Just wait 'til I learn more!!! Then you won't be able to shut me up

 

[deerman]

wonder how this has changed over the last few months.

So does that mean , 100 of us have to much free time.......100 seem very low......i would think it would be alot higher

 

[rebelcowboysnb]

No, 100 seems about right. I mean we all pretty much know who we are.

I get a kick out of seeing the reader count v/s the poster count on some threads. Ya know the ones with 5 posts but have been read 500 times.

 

[Katy]

Took me quite awhile to go thru the list and count pages of who had how many. I was bored that day and didn't want to do housework.