I wanted to see what others said before saying anything.
I believe both of yours are cockerels. My pullets usually don't get any comb color until they get close to POL.
My first thought besides them being males were that they had small combs. And ya they do look thick for leghorns.
BUT.....
Ive had MF leghorns from a few sources and to be honest theyve all been junk with about ever flaw.
Ive never had one with decent comb size for a LH and most have been to stocky. Ive also had red or red/white lobes as well as white shanks. Also some that laid tinted eggs.
The yellow legs is a great sign and their pattern is beautiful. They look more calico then MF but I like that and have never seen it on a MF leghorn.
Most that I had had a poor pattern. Lots looked buff Columbian with very little white.
If you hold on to them a while id love to see how they mature.
I believe both of yours are cockerels. My pullets usually don't get any comb color until they get close to POL.
My first thought besides them being males were that they had small combs. And ya they do look thick for leghorns.
BUT.....
Ive had MF leghorns from a few sources and to be honest theyve all been junk with about ever flaw.
Ive never had one with decent comb size for a LH and most have been to stocky. Ive also had red or red/white lobes as well as white shanks. Also some that laid tinted eggs.
The yellow legs is a great sign and their pattern is beautiful. They look more calico then MF but I like that and have never seen it on a MF leghorn.
Most that I had had a poor pattern. Lots looked buff Columbian with very little white.
If you hold on to them a while id love to see how they mature.