Monsanto

I have no problem with buisnesses having no smoking policies for their property, but the large hospital in my town has come out and said they will start phasing out sweetened drinks ( 2/3 of the drinks are sugar free and are going to something to the effect of 90%) their reasoning is it's for peoples health and it is like their no smoking policy on thier grounds. I saw someone had posted a comment on the newspaper website that they never heard of second hand diabeetes, I thought the comment was correct, if it is only effecting MY BODY why should it matter to them what I eat or drink?
My analogy was more about the inability to prevent invasive pollution. Monsanto's genetically modified plants do not "play nice in the sandbox" -- meaning that they don't keep their mutant genes to themselves. Rather, their genes jump around to other plants... the non-GMO crop fields of other farmers, and even to wild plants that are ancestral to modern crop plants. So, the wild and domesticated gene pools of plants are polluted and altered and there's nothing farmers or conservationists can do to stop it. Sort of like secondhand tobacco smoke -- We can choose not to smoke, but we can't always have the power and control to prevent others' smoke from drifting through the air and into our lungs.

Sugary drinks affect just the person drinking it, the sugary liquid doesn't drift over into other people's mouths.
wink.png
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom