I have not read the 26 pages - it took long enough to read the law!
Online petitions tend to be ignored, don't they?
I understand the problem of muscovy overrun. Somewhere I know I read an article in '07 that the muscovies were taking over Kenneth City (St. Pete, TampaBay) and the residents were very upset.
In my neighborhood, we're never had more than 14 (wild muscovy), 6 at my end of the street. I'm guessing that predators are taking care of the rest. And the neighbors never seem to have minded (one refilled the water bin in my yard while I was at work one day, when he saw thirsty ducks) but then, 6 ducks does not an overrun make. All of which is beside the point. (and not that i support the government's view on this)
They are throwing out the baby with the bathwater. They are putting out a tiny fire with a huge waterhose.
And even better, they are allowing wild birds to be murdered, chemically (that was one part of it, was it not?) Has anyone contacted PETA?
Sure, my duck is grandfathered in. But, on the off-chance someone sees her, it's been my experience that the authorities shoot first and ask questions later. (I had a pet sparrow in 2000. Took her to the vet for something and she was confiscated under "you cannot possess wild birds" by a vet who didn't know that starlings and sparrows were exempt due to not neing native. I didn't know either). So, they just took her. They probably fed her to something else (how is that "protecting" her?)
Couldn't they go for something less drastic. like enforced wing clipping so the threat of escape/migration is eliminated? Some sort of tagging? Something?
How many people will refuse to get involved cause they don't want big brother knocking on their door? Doesn't writing to a legislator say "hey! I have muscovies! (so in case you need to ill some, come here first! (after all, how can I prove she's 2 and a half?))"
Just a few questions... (probably already covered in the 26 pages)