- Thread starter
- #11
Quote:
I would NEVER intentionally injure an animal and leave it that way. I stated what I did becuase:
"§ 44-17-203. Killing or injuring dogs; defenses
In an action for damages against a person for killing or injuring a dog, satisfactory proof that the dog had been or was killing or worrying livestock constitutes a good defense to such action."
I in general believe in the sanctity of life, including my neighbor's dog(s). However, I believe it a little more for my own animals
This means an animal or person should be as free as possible to live as happy a life as possible including livestock.
I would NEVER intentionally injure an animal and leave it that way. I stated what I did becuase:
"§ 44-17-203. Killing or injuring dogs; defenses
In an action for damages against a person for killing or injuring a dog, satisfactory proof that the dog had been or was killing or worrying livestock constitutes a good defense to such action."
I in general believe in the sanctity of life, including my neighbor's dog(s). However, I believe it a little more for my own animals