I think I've now identified the following in our lawn and borders and growing as weeds in gaps in hard landscapes: perennial ryegrass (the backbone of any lawn, usually), other as yet unidentified lawn grasses, burnet, campions, celandines, chamomile, clovers, cocksfoot, cowslips, cranesbill, crocuses, daisies (the chickens love little lawn daisy flowers), dandelions, docks, fescues, hawkweed, hemp agrimony, knapweed, lucerne/ alfalfa, medicks, mullein, plantains, self-heal, timothy, trefoils, wild garlic, yarrow, and lots of ferns, mosses, liverworts and lichens. And fungi, all sorts.
Here in my impoverished ecology I am absolutely swooning over that wonderful exologic diversity.
20 minutes north of me across a geologic division there is diversity like that.
20 minutes south of me the paucity of species is even worse.
As for the moral aspect. Is it moral to abuse any species the way chickens have been abused over the last 100 years or so?
I have known several commercial chicken farmers over a couple decades of living in areas known for their chicken production, including one of my current pastors.
"Abuse" is a strong and inflammatory word and I can assure you that, with the sort of rare exception of a depraved individual you might find in any context, no farmer abuses the animals that are his livelihood -- if for no other reason than that abused animals don't produce and animals that don't produce don't make the farmer any money.
True, battery layers are not kept in the sort of lovely conditions that we backyarders aspire to, but if they aren't sufficiently well-kept to be healthy then they don't lay and thus the farmer goes broke. The farmers are neither evil nor stupid.
As for the Cornish X meatbirds, they're babies in gigantic brooders. We've all seen people here on these forums still keeping their 6-8 week chicks in tiny plastic tubs in significantly worse conditions than the careful environmental control in one of my region's giant broiler houses.
Nobody I can think of is trying to eliminate the world's most efficient source of complete protein, if chickens are in fact this,
There is no other farm animal that even comes close to the feed conversion ratio of a modern Cornish X broiler. That's an indisputable fact. There is some thought that fish farming might compete with that efficiency, but the fish require higher protein feed than the chickens do. Here's one summary: https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2018/f...ently-using-alternate-feed-efficiency-measure
Those who are trying to force the demise of what they label "factory farms" are indeed trying to rob low income people of food. On forums more suited to debate and political argument I have often challenged them to, if they wish to rob me of my affordable food, instead *personally* pay my family's grocery bills and none have ever chosen to do so.
