- Thread starter
- #801
Oops, didn't mean to quote it twice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gee, for a 4 week old there is no way that can be a pullet.. those combs are just too pink! Do you have any others to compare him/her too? If so do you mind sharing a side by side picture of the two so I can get a better idea of gender? Thanks
Gee, for a 4 week old there is no way that can be a pullet.. those combs are just too pink! Do you have any others to compare him/her too? If so do you mind sharing a side by side picture of the two so I can get a better idea of gender? Thanks
Gee, for a 4 week old there is no way that can be a pullet.. those combs are just too pink! Do you have any others to compare him/her too? If so do you mind sharing a side by side picture of the two so I can get a better idea of gender? Thanks
Oh boy! In this picture she totally looks like a pullet! Maybe a girl after all.
Oh boy! In this picture she totally looks like a pullet! Maybe a girl after all.
I'm back! There's still a SS that I'm not so sure on, since the comb is a bit larger than its hatch mate. Just wanted to get eyes on it again. It may just be that something damaged the comb on the other pullet?
This is Reba. I totally agree that this is a pullet. Just want to make sure she's seen for comparison.
Leave it to me that I can come up with a roo name that I like for this next one, the one in question, but haven't figured out another hen name if actually a pullet. I'm still tempted to call her Ringo regardless. It jumped at me and I like it. So...here's "Ringo"
Here they are with their heads together. Still a pullet? (Reba left, Ringo right) They're 10 weeks old.
![]()