- Jul 19, 2009
- 31
- 0
- 21
Quote:
I'm trying to understand why you do everything in secret. If you are doing something that you Know is your right and honestly, why do you have to sneak around and do stuff? Sneaking doesn't show honest actions.
What is the harm in informing the owner of their own pets actions? Inform them and inform the animal control. If anything happens, then the owners of the dogs can't deny not knowing. Once they have been informed and their dogs are still a pest then take care of them.
I think HighCountryChicken's solution is very good. Make them pay for their dog's actions and let them know that you are willing to solve your problem with a gun if you need to.... but inform them first. Give them a benefit of the doubt that it was a mistake on their part and let them correct it.
It's not her responsibility to seek out anybody and tell them where their dog is. It was running stray. It went to the pound. PERIOD!! That's what happens to strays (if they're lucky). Let the owner make the effort to actually go find their dog. It's their responsibility to seek out their lost dog. It's not Red's responsibility to seek out the neighbors and wipe their butts and hold their hands.
BTW I can tell you from personal experience that the people stupid enough to let their dogs roam are also stupid enough to be in denial and think that everybody loves their darling dog as much as they do. They never believe that their dogs killed chickens, and they never believe that a chicken can be a pet or worth more than a couple of dollars. If they have a fence that their dog has escaped from 100 times, they will put it in the same fence to escape a 101st time. If the dog has slipped it's collar and run off 100 times, they will put the same collar on it so it can slip it the 101st time. Then they stand there like an idiot and say, "I really tried to keep the dog in my yard, but I just can't stop him."
If a dog owner cares so little about their dog that they let it roam and can't be bothered to look for it at the pound themselves, then they really shouldn't have a dog anyway. If the dog is taken to the pound and the owner doesn't claim it, it at least has a chance to be adopted by somebody that actually cares about it.
If you had read the OP's message, it was stated that an unleashed dog walking With his owner jumped over another person's fence and killed the duck. If they were strays, there wouldn't be any "owners" to go looking for them at the pound. If you have a problem with a neighbor why not talk to him first? Isn't that why we speak a language, to communicate? I had no idea that communicating and trying to form a more positive reinforcement was "wiping their butts or holding their hands". When does anyone want to help out a neighbor this is spiteful?
If everything is shoot and kill, what do you think the angered neighbor would do back to you? Just because someone lets their dog roam free doesn't mean that they don't care about their dogs. Different places have different life styles. There is no need to be so black and white and judgmental.
And BTW, I also speak from experience. My neighbor's dog ran into my yard and killed one of my ducks. I wrote them a letter (as I was too emotional) and they patched up their fence the next day. Never had any problems since, and I can still look them in the eye.
I'm trying to understand why you do everything in secret. If you are doing something that you Know is your right and honestly, why do you have to sneak around and do stuff? Sneaking doesn't show honest actions.
What is the harm in informing the owner of their own pets actions? Inform them and inform the animal control. If anything happens, then the owners of the dogs can't deny not knowing. Once they have been informed and their dogs are still a pest then take care of them.
I think HighCountryChicken's solution is very good. Make them pay for their dog's actions and let them know that you are willing to solve your problem with a gun if you need to.... but inform them first. Give them a benefit of the doubt that it was a mistake on their part and let them correct it.
It's not her responsibility to seek out anybody and tell them where their dog is. It was running stray. It went to the pound. PERIOD!! That's what happens to strays (if they're lucky). Let the owner make the effort to actually go find their dog. It's their responsibility to seek out their lost dog. It's not Red's responsibility to seek out the neighbors and wipe their butts and hold their hands.
BTW I can tell you from personal experience that the people stupid enough to let their dogs roam are also stupid enough to be in denial and think that everybody loves their darling dog as much as they do. They never believe that their dogs killed chickens, and they never believe that a chicken can be a pet or worth more than a couple of dollars. If they have a fence that their dog has escaped from 100 times, they will put it in the same fence to escape a 101st time. If the dog has slipped it's collar and run off 100 times, they will put the same collar on it so it can slip it the 101st time. Then they stand there like an idiot and say, "I really tried to keep the dog in my yard, but I just can't stop him."
If a dog owner cares so little about their dog that they let it roam and can't be bothered to look for it at the pound themselves, then they really shouldn't have a dog anyway. If the dog is taken to the pound and the owner doesn't claim it, it at least has a chance to be adopted by somebody that actually cares about it.
If you had read the OP's message, it was stated that an unleashed dog walking With his owner jumped over another person's fence and killed the duck. If they were strays, there wouldn't be any "owners" to go looking for them at the pound. If you have a problem with a neighbor why not talk to him first? Isn't that why we speak a language, to communicate? I had no idea that communicating and trying to form a more positive reinforcement was "wiping their butts or holding their hands". When does anyone want to help out a neighbor this is spiteful?
If everything is shoot and kill, what do you think the angered neighbor would do back to you? Just because someone lets their dog roam free doesn't mean that they don't care about their dogs. Different places have different life styles. There is no need to be so black and white and judgmental.
And BTW, I also speak from experience. My neighbor's dog ran into my yard and killed one of my ducks. I wrote them a letter (as I was too emotional) and they patched up their fence the next day. Never had any problems since, and I can still look them in the eye.
Last edited:
