I don't think she'll be successful in getting anything amended or re-lawed. The *warning* is already in place by the law itself being in place. Its not against the law to shoot and kill an animal that is harassing your livestock. That in itself is warning enough. As any officer of the law will tell you "ignorance is no excuse".
Think of the repercussions of this (stupid) amendment-- What exactly is a warning? A warning shot? hunting down the dog owner door to door as the dog gnaws off yet another good hen? This makes me say bad words!!! Can you imagine a judge having to listen to this crap? What if the dog owner says "lalalalalalalala-Ican'thearyou-lalalala" while you are warning them? Will that stand up in court as saying they weren't sufficiently warned? Do you have to send a certified letter? Isn't family court already like this?
It is an unfortunate situation for her and her grief is understandable. As another in this thread wrote, she is looking to blame someone and point the finger.
Know what I think would make a good law?? That the dog owner must replace/reimburse the livestock owner for what the dog killed. If I'm not mistaken, here in Louisiana, she would be, by law, reimbursing him for his chickens. I'm going to go look that up and I'll edit when I find it. Or when I don't find it
Think of the repercussions of this (stupid) amendment-- What exactly is a warning? A warning shot? hunting down the dog owner door to door as the dog gnaws off yet another good hen? This makes me say bad words!!! Can you imagine a judge having to listen to this crap? What if the dog owner says "lalalalalalalala-Ican'thearyou-lalalala" while you are warning them? Will that stand up in court as saying they weren't sufficiently warned? Do you have to send a certified letter? Isn't family court already like this?
It is an unfortunate situation for her and her grief is understandable. As another in this thread wrote, she is looking to blame someone and point the finger.
Know what I think would make a good law?? That the dog owner must replace/reimburse the livestock owner for what the dog killed. If I'm not mistaken, here in Louisiana, she would be, by law, reimbursing him for his chickens. I'm going to go look that up and I'll edit when I find it. Or when I don't find it