Quote:
Walt, didn't some Cornish breeders try arguing to change the Cornish standard at Shawnee because of the lack of a pearl eye in the UK standard and no pearl eyes in the US birds? Yet someone had some pearl eye Cornish in their truck at Shawnee.
Glad you mentioned Ralph Brazelton. He had to hang up on me once because he had hens in trapnests that needed to be released. His Orpingtons would produce 200+ eggs per year and still meet the SOP. It was an honor competing with at the shows. I would sell everything to get some of his line. Well, almost everything. Would you trade Jacob for a trio of Ralph's line Buff Orps?
I have a question Walt..of corse the standard is the thing to live by. , heres the thing..Doug acres mixed up german new hampshires and delaware, he won nationals with resulting pullet..he wanted to correct a few things and he did it..the new hampshirees which were foundation bird of delaware breed, germans took the breed , made a better tail on it and doug wasnt afraid to introduce a foundation breed back , delawares needeed a shot in the arm so to speak, you know what I mean you have been at thier thread..dougs really a master breeder I think, he does what he knows he needs to do to get a result, he had it in his mind , if I add the perfect german hampshire tail back into dels , well the result was a WOW ..My question is this, when I TALK TO FREINDS IN AUSTRALIA LINDA AND BRYAN, AND SHOW THEM what I have they correct me and offer advise on australorps , first thing they said was """tails too big...fix it.""I said with what? they said you need to add the foundation back in, dont mess with langshans like australia did , they got red between the toes, serious fault so best not mess with that make a mess a bigger mess, best to add the foundation to correct tail issues..the aussie rooster I have is from east coast champions bath NY..my hens are pretty much trash, I do have a couple BOBs both fair shows and APA. ..blk orps are the foundation on wich australorps was built..is that what you mean by mixing breeds? cochin is foundation breed for orps and a few brits said they infused it back in to neaten up the tail and add bulk..they were unafraid to correct a problem .is that what you mean by mixing breeds?I dont think that its worth arguing whos are better UK or US. EACH have different climatic conditions owners needs ect..someday austalian breeders may turn to us or UK breeders and vise versa..australians I think are almost evolving the australorp way beyond what it was intended as a monster egg layer with lots of curves, they are loosing thier curves and getting a V shape too short necks ect..
right in the book that somone just posted in here, 1812 I think, the breeder who wrote it said he did same thing kept his head down and charged forward threw this and that into the pot showed, won and got orders from all over creation the next year..he said 60 years of trial error and lots of experience in show ring.
I tend to lean toward american blk orps, the good ones. I dont know, over all I leaned back toward that expression I saw on that page in US SOP. I am working toward a bit of aussie down under, but Im not going to make the great bird of curves look like a V like they did .look on thier site they are more ball than curves or V shapped. but Im not going to quit at this and wait for somone to make a decision for me..Im going to keep at it and I am pretty happy with what Im getting ., there just are not many of these real australorps here they are on endangered list. if they need a foundation shot, they shall have one.
the australorp was created as a project to increase egg production, blk orps had terrible low number of eggs for a while and needed to improve it. I like projects as long as they are practical.and keep to standard..sometimes something needs a fix...things always evolve thats life, sometimes for better sometimes for worse..the standard gives a base to build on. I didnt see that much of a drastic difference between the 2 standards, fashion dictates and fads come and go