Quote:
I agree with this. I think the UK Orps are very cool looking. They do not even come close to the APA SOP's definition of an Orpington though. I have received many emails asking if the APA Orp Standards will be changed to the UK Standards. That is the only reason I have made a statement about these birds. Many of the UK breeds that we also recognize look different.
That includes some of the American breeds they recognize. They have different Standards and as I said earlier. "They don't use our Standards and we don't use theirs".
The UK Orp is a different breed as far as I am concerned. To be clear....THIS IS MY PERSONAL OPINION...this is not a statement from the APA. The APA has no position on this, but a UK Orp should be DQ'ed in a show, as it has the wrong breed type according to the current Orpington APA Standard. Wrong breed type=DQ.
One day I may raise some UK Orps, as I think they are very pretty birds, but I will never think of them as a dual purpose bird as our Orps are now.
Walt
I agree with this. I think the UK Orps are very cool looking. They do not even come close to the APA SOP's definition of an Orpington though. I have received many emails asking if the APA Orp Standards will be changed to the UK Standards. That is the only reason I have made a statement about these birds. Many of the UK breeds that we also recognize look different.
That includes some of the American breeds they recognize. They have different Standards and as I said earlier. "They don't use our Standards and we don't use theirs".
The UK Orp is a different breed as far as I am concerned. To be clear....THIS IS MY PERSONAL OPINION...this is not a statement from the APA. The APA has no position on this, but a UK Orp should be DQ'ed in a show, as it has the wrong breed type according to the current Orpington APA Standard. Wrong breed type=DQ.
One day I may raise some UK Orps, as I think they are very pretty birds, but I will never think of them as a dual purpose bird as our Orps are now.
Walt