Other people's dogs and my chickens

When chickens are terrorized, or even frightened, they may stop the egg laying process. The hen delays laying her egg until it is safe. Hens can be so terrorized that she stops laying. This results in an egg remaining inside and can be fatal. Also, if the dog manged to injure the bird, but you can't see it, an egg could have broken inside her and that would be death for her too.

We have had similar problems. The neighbors all let their dogs run loose in the area. I've called the police at least twenty times over this. One particular neighbor's dog killed ducks, geese, cats, and our baby goats. Not just my livestock, but also other small farmers in the area as well. No amount of discussion put a stop to them allowing their dogs off their property. Their attitude was that "dogs should be dogs".

Finally, another neighbor got so frustrated with lost livestock that she captured the dog when it was on her property and took it to some other town and adopted it out. The other big offender threatened me with violence on two incidents after his dogs were picked up by animal control. On the second incident he was enraged and nearly broke down my front door trying to get in to kill me. The police came and arrested him.

That was the turning point in our area about law enforcement beginning to enforce laws.

Keep in mind you have every right to shoot any dog on your rural property even if it is not attacking anything. Why? Because a dog is a dog is a dog. The law in most places recognizes it is better to prevent loss of livestock then to try to fix it later.

People used to claim I didn't want their dogs on my property because I hate dogs. Really? I have three of them. That usually puts a stop to that.

One thing is for sure, you will quickly lose friends if you insist they abide by your no dog rules. The friends who remain are true good friends.
 
Keep in mind you have every right to shoot any dog on your rural property even if it is not attacking anything.  Why?  Because a dog is a dog is a dog.   The law in most places recognizes it is better to prevent loss of livestock then to try to fix it later


I just wanted to note that this isn't always true depending on the laws in your individual county or RM. The laws around here seem to be different everywhere you go. Some say shoot any stray animal any where you find it, some say you must catch them in the act of harassing livestock in order to shoot it, some say they have to kill livestock before you can shoot and some say you just can't...

We recently had a case where the livestock owner lost over their right to protect their animals. An extra large breed dog was chasing and harassing his horses. He warned the people they needed to get him off his property but the people couldn't catch the dog so he shot it. Unfortunately the "people" were the kids who owned the dog. The parents called the cops and insisted the man "needed to be held responsible for killing the dog..." strangely they didn't think they should have been more responsible for the dog by keeping it safe in the first place but, they won. They nailed him for wrongfully shooting a dog, and both he and his wife got fined for having a firearm in their possession without a proper licence, on top of that I think they lost their rifles. I kinda get where the dog owners are coming from too though, I'm not sure about blasting a dog with the kids right there trying to catch it. That may have influenced the case. The news got a hold of the story and a cute picture of the dog and it blew up with people phoning, petitioning and demanding the the "Dog murderer" be brought to justice... People just don't get it...
 
I suppose we would have to define "rural" for this discussion to be very plausible. I live in a "rural" area, on a gravel road that is roughly 4 miles long, with only 3 houses on it, two of which are mine and my parents. The other is a half-mile away, over a hill and around a curve, out of sight. I will not hesitate to shoot any dog I see on my property. Been living out here somewhere around 38 years, and it just sort of goes with the territory. It's part of land ownership, having your own place. I shoot critters from my front porch. There's a brown patch at the west end of the porch where grass don't grow. It's called "rural" living. And I love it!
 
Fortunately here in the U.S. the law almost always sides with the owner of the land on which the animals reside. The law allows you to protect your animals and property against threats like dogs, varmints and predators of most descriptions. I can't say every state is like this, but most are. Do yourself a favor and ask your local law agency for the exact statute concerning dogs/predators and livestock. Look it up yourself(don't take the local deputies word for it) and print it out to keep on hand should a conflict arise.
 
Here in Texas the law usually does side with the land owner. We had a lady renting a house on our property and she had beautiful springer spaniels champion field dogs. One morning we went out to total slaugter of one entire chicken run and they had started on another. Three of her spaniel s were killing our chickens as fast as they could. Grandpa shot 2 dead and the other he shot in the leg as he ran home. She called the sheriff he came and looked at the carnage and then went over to her and gave her a citation! We took lots of picture because she claimed the dogs were worth $5000 each plus she wanted us to pay her vet bills for the 3rd one. Got to court and the judge sided with us and got on to her for wasting his time!
 
The mistake they made was talking to minors. They should have called the police and told them their $10,000 horse was about to be killed by the neighbors' dog. That is all they needed to protect their rights.
 
here in Texas you have the right to protect your property from all attacks with proper and necessary force...... we only been challenged once by a person who lost 2 expensive dogs by the good marksmanship of one of my employees who was protecting our calves and poultry from attack.... the 2 dogs killed a duck, 3 chickens and wounded a calf that had to be put down.. he tried to sue us for $5,000 but the judge made him pay us $8,000 for our damages instead... there have been several similar cases since then that i am aware of....the landowners have always prevailed.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom