- Thread starter
- #211
No. 75% white and 25% split to white.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Legg's peafowl and deerman do not agree with your statemant, they say:Again, if there's no standardization of terms, people will remain confused.
I'm sure you've all seen that "Pied X Pied = 25% Dark Pied, 50% Pied, 25% White" posted on various websites. Well, the "Dark Pied" in that equation is a pea with two copies of the Pied gene, which would NOT look like a normal IB with a tiny white spot on the throat. A pea that looked like that would be split to Pied (only one copy of the Pied gene), or possibly split to White (only one copy of the White gene) but more likely the former.
Peas with two copies of Pied (i.e. Dark Pied) will have a larger amount of white on the throat, and larger areas of white on the wings -- but no white patches on the back or in the tail or in other non-symmetrical areas. Dark Pied breeds true, just like White does. What is called "Pied" is a cross between White and Dark Pied, and this cross doesn't breed true -- it gives the percentages I previously mentioned.
I understand it gets confusing because people aren't consistent with using terms, and I also understand that some of what I say will be counter to what you were told by breeders or other peafowl people, but I'm trying to organize what I see into a way that makes sense genetically. For example, the middle pic on the page linked here is captioned as being a Blackshoulder Pied peacock. If we accept that the Pied phenotype results from a pea having one copy of Pied and one copy of White (which fits the oft-quoted equation I mentioned at the beginning of my post), then we should see the effects of both mutations -- white on front throat, white on wings, white on belly (from Pied), and patches of white in random areas of the body, neck and tail (from White). But the peacock in the photo has a rather neat and symmetrical presentation of white -- just on the throat and wings and belly, with no random white patches elsewhere. That phenotype results from having two copies of Pied and no copies of White -- thus the peacock is Dark Pied. THOSE are the birds which, when bred with White peas, will produce 100% Pied offspring. If you are told that Dark Pied birds have just a white feather or two, you're looking for split to Pied, or split to White, peas. Using those with a White will NOT result in 100% Pied offspring.
![]()
The only eggs that I had that were fertile in 2011 were from Deerman's charcoal pair here are some of the babies in 2012 (missing from picture is anothe pied male and a pied hen) They ranged from white to pied to w/e to IB to charcoalI am not disputing your results but I see no possible combination of genes in those two birds that could produce all of those combinations. To get whites each bird would have to carry white. To get pieds at least one would also have to carry pied. That means one would have to BE pied and thus would be visually pied. To get silver pied, since one already has to be pied we per the previous sentence, both would have to carry pied, white and we and thus would be visual.
What am I missing?
I would reserve the right to say there is a difference between a pied white eye bird and a silver pied bird, but yes. If your boy produced an all white eye offspring he must have a white eye gene.
Legg's peafowl and deerman do not agree with your statemant, they say:
India Blue Pied to India Blue Pied produce 25% White, 50% India Blue Pied
and 25% India Blue Dark Pied. These Dark Pied birds are solid colored with White throat latches and or White flights.
deerman says:
dark pied and birds split white , will look alike only knowing their background will you know, unless you breed them.
Now these guys have been breeding birds longer then some of us been alive and your stating that they are wrong? Now Deerman knew a lot about genetics, but unfortunately he is no longer here to talk about it.
Minx, Rosa is right. I was wrong. Too much cold medicine.No, you were right. Split to White X White = 50% White and 50% split to White. It's the same as breeding any other split with a visual for the same non-sex-linked mutation.
![]()
The only eggs that I had that were fertile in 2011 were from Deerman's charcoal pair here are some of the babies in 2012 (missing from picture is anothe pied male and a pied hen) They ranged from white to pied to w/e to IB to charcoal
Last year I hatched out this little wonder, so in order to get charcoal chick do I need a split to charcoal hen? To have the chick look like this what does the parents have to look like?:
Here's another silver pied that also hatched from 2013 hatch from the charcoal pair
Unfortunately there was an accident, my grandmother who is 94 was looking into the tub that I kept the chicks in after they outgrew the brooder and she feel and grabed the tub and I lost some of the babies that were in it and the silver pieds were among those lost![]()
Deerman told me when he gave me the charcoals that I will have a colorful hatch. He then told me that the male was a charcoal w/e split to silver pied and the hen was Ib split to charcoal split to pied. That is all I know and those are some of what hatched from the charcoal pen - can't get confused it is the only "C" pen I have.