- Dec 18, 2013
- 90
- 8
- 31
Are there any updates on the crosses? Did and ever lay eggs? Did the color change at all?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just so Im clear about this cross-breeding thing, if I cross a pheasant (whether golden or ringneck) with say a leghorn all offspring will be infertile? If that is the case then I dont see any point in doing it really. I was hoping for something that tasted more like pheasant than chicken but didnt only lay 60 eggs a year.
Something not covered here, or at least I did not observe it is Haldane's Rule. Namely as it applies to the suggestion of 100% sterility in Chicken-Pheasant hybrids. It basically means that a males from such a hybrid would be nearly 100% sterile, but the females could be fertile or at least partially fertile. "HALDANE's rule" states that, if species hybrids of one sex only are inviable or sterile, the afflicted sex is much more likely to be heterogametic (XY) than homogametic (XX). We show that most or all of the phenomena associated with HALDANE's rule can be explained by the simple hypothesis that alleles decreasing hybrid fitness are partially recessive. Under this hypothesis, the XY sex suffers more than the XX because X-linked alleles causing postzygotic isolation tend to have greater cumulative effects when hemizygous than when heterozygous, even though the XX sex carries twice as many such alleles. The dominance hypothesis can also account for the "large X effect," the disproportionate effect of the X chromosome on hybrid inviability/sterility. In addition, the dominance theory is consistent with: the long temporal lag between the evolution of heterogametic and homogametic postzygotic isolation, the frequency of exceptions to HALDANE's rule, puzzling Drosophila experiments in which "unbalanced" hybrid females, who carry two X chromosomes from the same species, remain fertile whereas F1 hybrid males are sterile, and the absence of cases of HALDANE's rule for hybrid inviability in mammals. We discuss several novel predictions that could lead to rejection of the dominance theory.