Photo Critique Club

Post #1784 - Which one do you like best? Please vote and explain why in a reply


  • Total voters
    36
- Subject (product) orientation - versus
- Lens (camera) orientation - versus
- Final presentation orientation -

[Final presentation orientation being the "specs" or specifications for the media (BYC Calendar for example) within where the image is finally used.]

What do you all think of this photo?
View attachment 4118980
It was very cloudy that day.

What do I think of this photo?

I think it is wonderful that you like to make your images more interesting by placing your products next to trees, plants, buildings, etc; however try remember what it is you are trying to draw attention to. In this image, besides lighting issues (which I think was covered very nicely by others), the subject (in this case the mobile phone product), by its Subject orientation (which is portrait), is not calling attention (is lost) in the space created by the Lens orientation (which is landscape).

----------

If I were to assume that the Final presentation orientation ("specs") is limited to landscape only, then that would explain why the Ĺens orientation is therefore landscape. In this case, ask, can the Subject orientation be adjusted to bring more attention to the subject itself?

- If the answer is yes, then one of the ways is to simply turn the subject (mobile phone) to a landscape orientation, allowing the photographer to move in closer and thereby allowing the product to have more prominence within the Lens orientation space.

- If the answer is no... well, then it becomes complicated and I suggest further self-study on how to draw attention to a product within limited parameters, as it would take too long for me to explain it here.

----------

If the Final presentation orientation were not an issue, and if I were to then assume that the Subject orientation is to be limited to portrait (upright), then in this case the Lens orientation could be turned to portrait to adjust to the Subject orientation, once again allowing the subject more prominence within Lens orientation space. Simplified - make the image portrait and move in closer.

----------

Note in general: sometimes the Lens orientation can not be helped because of an awkward location of a subject and/or an awkward positional angle one finds one's self in as the photographer in relation to the location of a subject. In this case, try to leave space around the subject which will give room enough to enable one to edit the orientation in post-production in order to fit any required "specs".
 
Last edited:
That is the original.
I very much doubt that, considering that the first image does not have the chicken's back in the picture; and the distortion of the background in the second picture leads to me to conclude that there is more on the original uncropped image?
:idunno

...but if you do not wish to share the original then that is okay.
 
My eye still goes right to the shed in both photos, not the intended subject.

As for the chicken, the adjusted photo is better but the head seems to be a little blurry? Could be my eyes.
 
I haven’t posted here before but I am trying to downsize the number of pictures on my phone (I have 7,000+) and can’t determine which of these is the best.

Thanks in advance!
IMG_5539.jpeg
IMG_5546.jpeg
IMG_5555.jpeg
 
Second one. The head is centered in photo, can see all the other chickens in the background and I like the profile of the head, neck and comb. Pretty neck feathering color.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom