Political Ramblings

Status
Not open for further replies.
In the end that figure is correct. The manipulations with much smaller amounts to get there is the object lesson here. Dumping smaller amounts that caused market fluctuations and then picking up devalued stock allowed them to build. Their actions on silver alone, which is a miniscule reflection of the bigger market created huge shock waves across the entire market. Comparatively that 8% is a much larger amount than anything the hunts ever started to work with.
 
The Congress established three key objectives for monetary policy—maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates—in the Federal Reserve Act.

This is the major job of the FED. Sometimes these conflict with each other, but they try to balance all of these for the good of the country.

No one has answered, what would replace the FED if we ended it ?
 
In the end that figure is correct. The manipulations with much smaller amounts to get there is the object lesson here. Dumping smaller amounts that caused market fluctuations and then picking up devalued stock allowed them to build. Their actions on silver alone, which is a miniscule reflection of the bigger market created huge shock waves across the entire market. Comparatively that 8% is a much larger amount than anything the hunts ever started to work with.

So would you agree with the people that say we should go back to the gold standard ?
 
At no time did I sat end it. What I did say is that we have been living under a system based on perpetual unending growth in a finite world. An interest based system can only survive under continual growth and we have reached a saturation point where the system is cracking. In this world the tangible resources are finite and interest assumes they are ever expanding. So when interest and debt servicing surpasses the actual tangible assets available we started to layer the debt structure much like the investment banks did. Yes it causes an economic upturn and serves to stabilize for a while. But it is artificial and sooner or later the system will try to self correct through inflation, recession etc.. This is a cycle we are currently applying bandaids to and deepening the impact when it all finally snaps.
 
At no time did I sat end it. What I did say is that we have been living under a system based on perpetual unending growth in a finite world. An interest based system can only survive under continual growth and we have reached a saturation point where the system is cracking. In this world the tangible resources are finite and interest assumes they are ever expanding. So when interest and debt servicing surpasses the actual tangible assets available we started to layer the debt structure much like the investment banks did. Yes it causes an economic upturn and serves to stabilize for a while. But it is artificial and sooner or later the system will try to self correct through inflation, recession etc.. This is a cycle we are currently applying bandaids to and deepening the impact when it all finally snaps.

Didn't mean to say you said to end it. Someone earlier said we should end it and use our own money and when I asked them what they meant I got no answer. And that's the usual response.

So how do we better the system ? Don't we have continual growth ? There's more consumers in the world everyday.
 
The end effect of the perpetual quest for profit and coupled interest eventually turns money into an item that has no value. Simple math tracing a dollar from the time it is created and tracking it through the system shows us that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom