I've used Ivermectin, and it works fine, but permethrin also works great, as does fenbendazole, and both are approved in the USA. If I use Ivermectin again, it will be because it's all that will work for a particular parasite.
It's off limits for laying hens because it does linger in the yolks, as many products tend to do.
Mary
Fair enough, I completely understand your reasoning. It's always best to stand on the side of caution. You have far more experience with chicken keeping than I do, and you've found a solution that works best for you and that you can recommend to others.
I agree that you should always try the approved treatments before resorting to something with less vigorous studies.
With that said, I do like to read up on why something should or shouldn't be used, and I like to share my experiences. In my short time in chicken keeping I've spoken to many breeders and avian vets and have done a lot of extensive research of my own. Ivermectin was something I researched heavily and spoke to numerous sources to get all the information.
I'm not sure of the figures in the US, but in Australia, we have legislation that sets the allowed limits of traces of administered drugs within our food sources (meat, milk, eggs, etc).
Ivermectin in milk is legal to 0.05 mg/kg (50 µg/kg), but hasn't been measured for eggs. Everything else within the legislation that has both milk and eggs have the residual limits at exactly the same. The only study I can find found that peak residual ivermectin from an
oral drench in egg-yolks was measured to 0.0019 mg/kg (1.9 µg/kg). Peak residual ivermectin from a subcutaneous injection was the maximum residual seen in yolks at 0.023 mg/kg (23.3 µg/kg). The study didn't measure pour-on.
All of the above figures are well below the legislated maximums for consumption. I just personally don't see the harm in using Ivermectin, nor do I see the point of a withholding period in eggs with such low measured residual amounts.
I do agree that a permethrin spray should be tried first though. It's much easier to source and there's far more science to back it up.