Wels,- there is no harm in looking.
And the 60 dollar colt that would have been the original project horse, wasn't really halter broke, wasn't broke to lead, tie, trailer.. and had serious issues with being caught in the pasture.
ALL due to the negligence of his breeder who has 2 weanlings, 3 other stud colts, and 2 young fillies @ 2yrs old.
I got him to lead in one session, and tie, a tiny bit of ground work, and start on desensitizing to be ready to trailer, in another session.
No sweat, no beating, praise, pressure and release/approach and retreat, and treats.
I do appreciate your candor.
My question to you is this, is it a crime to help a person who did something stupid and breeds horses that are fugly, or buys a horse and realizes it is beyond
their level needed to ride or train?
If I have the time, energy, space, knowledge, and it won't cost me anything more than MY time to pay for the upkeep of any horse, why make
an issue of it, such an issue that you need to stand on a soap box.
Should we punish people who breed fugly horses, or underfeed them, and some how prevent them from getting rid of those horses to some one, who
may take one and train it, so that people look past the ugly and see a good natured, reliable, sane horse?
Yes people should be more conscientious about breeding, yes there should be laws, or inspections of horses to say yes and no to ones that aren't fit
for breeding. Yes, some one should try to educate people in proper feeding and care of horses, and there should be some regulation.
BUT it isn't happening. Not here in the US, where there are horses dumped on Native American reservations, city streets, national forests, and in
peoples trailers when they go for a trail ride at their favorite county park.
I guess it is time to end this thread.
Thank you for your time and opinion.
I do appreciate what you are saying. But you are trying to punish the people who were the fugly breeder or inexperienced person who took on too many horses with too little food.
Carol