How very odd . . . ..in over 30 years of keeping rabbits, and of the
hundreds of animals I have owned, I have only taken a rabbit to see a vet twice. I wonder why my animals seem to be so much healthier?
Yes, a person should do their research, but there is an awful lot of nonsense on the internet. Before they follow any advice, a person should make sure that the information comes from someone who actually knows what they are talking about.
A lot of people will tell you that rabbits are social by nature, but they also tell you about this elaborate process that you have to go through to get the rabbits to "bond" to each other. My question is, if they are naturally social, why do you have to go through such an intricate song and dance which may take weeks or even months to get them to tolerate each other? To me, the answer seems pretty simple - they aren't naturally social, they are naturally
antisocial, and you have to overcome that natural tendency to get them to live peaceably together. Research on the behavior of their wild ancestors seems to bear that out. Even the House Rabbit Society, for whom the idea of rabbits in cages is anathema, will tell you that there are some rabbits that just cannot get along with other rabbits. Rather than assume that these rabbits are in some way warped or damaged, it seems to me that their behavior is much more like that of the rabbit in nature, and it's these "bonded" rabbits that are actually abnormal. Baby rabbits instinctively huddle together; if they didn't, they would die. As rabbits reach adolescence, the need for their own territory asserts itself, and they begin picking on each other and even fighting. Some naturally more passive rabbits may never get to that point. We, as breeders, may artificially select for a more docile temperament in the interest of making people-friendly pets, but that doesn't change the essential nature of a rabbit, and you can't assume that all rabbits are going to continue to behave like babies as they become adults.