Recessive wheaten question

Quote:
That's the way it's done. You just choose a female that has a really light colored breast and is a good deep reddish cinnamon color on top. I'll try to post pictures of what the males look like in a couple of hours.

I also Believe Mahogany a weak Columbian like restrictor can be selected to have a stronger effect, I believe Saladin is doing just that...


Edit.. Cool pic of Saladin Awesome looking bird in previous page...<------
 
Last edited:
I am back, with pictures!!
wink.png


The first photo, of 2 wheaten hens, for your consideration. The interesting thing about this picture, is that the hen in the front is pure Cubalaya. The hen in the back is 75% Cubalaya, 25% production type barred plymouth rock. I was sure last year, that the cross/grade hen was a silver wheaten. Now, I don't think so. I think she is just "regular" wheaten, not" Cubalaya/Cinnamon" wheaten. So, to me, ( I could be wrong!!) this implies that the "Cubalaya/cinnmamon" type wheaten is regular wheaten plus some sort of " x-factor", some modifier, that was lost in the course of the crossing. Does this idea make any sense? If so, what would the missing piece be that makes regular wheaten into "Cubalaya "wheaten?

42987_031.jpg
 
More pictures...

42987_034.jpg


Standard pure yellow white type wheaten chick

42987_033.jpg


Same as above, but, with a "red butt". These will grow up to be a darker tinted adult.

42987_039.jpg


This is an example of the ones with faint, broken back striping, partly feathered out.

42987_035.jpg


Het. dominant white????

42987_048.jpg


Older version of het. dominant white?
 
And more pictures...

This is what I call a partridge chick, cross of a Cubalaya with a breed I know is Partridge (eb). I figured this would have been a wheaten bird, which is what started this whole question thread in the first place-it's not wheaten!!!
tongue.png


42987_040.jpg


Older version of same..

42987_045.jpg


Brown Red/Black chick, out of white parents...

42987_037.jpg


Older version of same, note odd red/brown spot on head, many of the black? type chicks had this odd spot?????

42987_038.jpg
 
Some oddities...

My line or strain of silver/gold wheatens always feathers out very very slowly..The cockerels almost are crowing before they have good backs and tails!!

A few pics of a silver duckwing/silver wheaten pullet, note naked back...

42987_046.jpg


42987_047.jpg


A picture of a really odd leg-part black/blue/white!!!

42987_036.jpg
 
Quote:
There could be a modifier that darkens the wheaten color on the bird to a cinnamon color. The best way to determine this is by crossing a cublaya with a light brown leghorn and analyse the results. Then by doing F1 reciprocal crosses , see what segregates. A person would have to hatch quit a few F2 chicks so one could analyse the ratios. One would have to run a chi square using the numbers of phenotypes that segregate.

Tim
 
Quote:
I love your Cinnamon color..

Tim have you checked Saladin Ginger Roo in the previous page? what are you thoughts on him?... I am starting to fall in love with Cubalayas, they are one facinating breed...
lol.png
 
Quote:
That's the way it's done. You just choose a female that has a really light colored breast and is a good deep reddish cinnamon color on top. I'll try to post pictures of what the males look like in a couple of hours.

Quote:
Saladin can you post a pic of a Ginger Red Hen? I believe we could have a Weird Wheaten allele in our hands here, check below basque breeds, seems like neather Db nor Barring has any effect on the hens... both chicken breeds are related and based on wheaten

First breed, Marraduna Euskal Oiloa(Barring)


LLodiana(Db) (check how simmilar the hens look in both breeds)


I bet your hens look like them, basicaly a wheaten looking hen...
 
yellow legs ,
Quote:
There is such a thing as Dominant Wheaten, its dominant in wild looking birds(Black Breasted of all backgrounds that allows for Black Breasted Brow,e+,eb,ewh, ey,) with that in mind eWheaten(eWh) is Dominant to Wild Type(e+) and wild type looking(Black Breasted Red Looking)eb(brown) and its Dominant to Recessive Wheaten(ey) allele. this mutant was found in the most wild of wild examples... in the Red Jungle Fowl(found to be recessive to Wild type e+) I´ll have to dig some old info about it....

Quote:
yes its possible, her are some reading from Dr. Ron Okimoto a very respected scientist, very loved at the Classroom in the coop forums..

this is what he had to say(Taken from thread (in "E locus order of dominance (again!) )
Ron Okimoto. :

Even E isn't completely dominant on some genetic backgrounds. In some cases I've gotten eWH ER heterozygotes that look like eb birds.

Recessive wheaten is a strange story, but Smyth has told me that he used to maintain a recessive wheaten line, and Morejohn had a Red Junglefowl line that segregated wheaten downed chicks from wild-type parents in 3:1.

There probably is a recessive wheaten somewhere. I found a Buff Rock line that segregates for a weird E locus allele that seems to be a double mutant. I got it from McMurray. It has the Fayoumi birchin mutation and the dominant wheaten mutation in the same gene. I don't know what the phenotype of such a bird would be like. The Fayoumi mutation would send signal all the time (produce black pigment) and the wheaten mutation would inhibit signal propagation. At least, that is the theory if wheaten is like red fur color in mammals.

The idea is that dominant wheaten is dominant because of haplo insufficiency. This just means that in the presence of wheaten not enough signal is sent by the e+ or eb allele product and you get wheaten instead of stippled. Recessive wheaten would produce enough signal so that heterozygotes could still produce stippling, but homozygous recessive wheatens could not because two low signal producing gene products could not produce enough signal to produce stippling.

You can look at it like this, say that eWh eWh homozygotes produced 0 signal, eWh e+ heterozygotes produced 1/2 signal, but it isn't enough to produce wild-type phenotypes. Recessive wheaten might produce 1/4 signal or homozygous ey ey would produce 1/2 signal and heterozygous ey e+ would produce 3/4 (1/4 + 1/2)signal. The ey ey homozygotes would not produce enough signal and be wheaten, but the ey e+ heterozygotes do.

E and ER would be dominant to wheaten because the E and ER gene products produce enough signal in the heterozygotes to continue to produce the black phenotypes.

The E allele would be expected to send the most signal and has been found to not be regulated properly and seems to always send signal whether the receptor binds hormone or not. So it is always on and always sending signal to make black pigment. It has two mutations that in mammals are associated with black fur. One of the mutations is found in black wooled sheep, and the other is found in black furred mice. The E allele combines those two mutations. The probable birchin allele has only one of these (the one found in mice) two mutations and so may not send as much signal as the E allele product. The Fayoumi birchin allele has a totally different mutation that has not been found in mammals at this time, but produces a similar phenotype to the birchin (ER) allele.

The funky allele that I found in Buff Rocks has the dominant wheaten mutation and the Fayoumi birchin mutation combined. The two mutations should do different things to the gene. Beats me what it looks like without the columbian restrictors.

Quote:
this is where Dominant Wheaten gets all messy...

Wheaten is Only Dominant to all other e alleles if NO Melanizers(be it Dominant or recessive in nature) are present...so if you had Ml(dominant Melanitic) that would cancel Dominant eWh and you will have a eb(Brown) looking chick down...

below quote is taken from
http://www.the-coop.org/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=30553&page=2 Dominance of Wheaten

Quote:
Hope I was of some help..​
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom