Exactly. We learned a lot when we contacted our state's Game & Fish Commission. We now have a depredation permit so that we may
legally deal with predators such as fox and raccoons.
I definitely don't fall into the "SSS" camp, but I'm not so naive as to believe we can "all just get along," either. And I don't buy the line that "nature" will balance out the predator load, either. We (humans) have pretty much disrupted the natural balance of wildlife so that it will never be the same. What "natural" predators do raccoons have, in most (I realize that some are living among bears and cougars, but I'm talking "most") places with substantial human population? The only thing that would keep their populations in check without predators of their own would be, mainly, a limited food-source. And if they're supplementing their diets on my livestock, well, even if I don't mind that, doesn't that throw off the whole "natural" balance of prey to predator? By feeding the raccoons, I'm allowing them to increase their population.
I also agree with a previous poster that there isn't much, in the way of livestock housing, that is absolutely 100% predator-proof. You do the best you can, sure, but there's always going to be some weakness to be exploited. And even if you could keep your chickens in a prey animal's version of a bomb-shelter, with concrete floors, cinder-block walls, sealed roofs, artificial light...would you want to? Would THEY prefer it? I kinda doubt it.
To get to the point where we'd wind up gunning for them, raccoons on our property must first show brazen disregard for
boundaries. If they're that desperate, that hungry, then there must be too many of them for our area to support. At that point, I don't see any difference in them being humanely dispatched by my husband, and being messily devoured by any other bigger, badder predator...except that my husband is much easier on them.