PunkërTeçhñöRøø§ter :
If its your land and the COMPANY proposed the idea then you put down a statement with a number, with alot of zeros behind it for the land. They cant take your land under Imminent Domain just because of a company. It has to be public use.
!
It's eminent domain and oh yes they can use it like that. People on the coast here lost their houses so that the land could be given to a developer who built luxury condos on it - the use was considered "in the public good" by bringing in more tax revenue.
I VEHEMENTLY disagree with this, but it has been done repeatedly. There was a farm near here that was taken for the development of a golf course!
Use the press, use the press use the press. People are pretty sick of the little guy getting screwed right now, call the person who wrote the article and tell them no one had told you and you want the public to hear the other side.
Fight fight fight and at the very least hold out for the $$$
If its your land and the COMPANY proposed the idea then you put down a statement with a number, with alot of zeros behind it for the land. They cant take your land under Imminent Domain just because of a company. It has to be public use.
!
It's eminent domain and oh yes they can use it like that. People on the coast here lost their houses so that the land could be given to a developer who built luxury condos on it - the use was considered "in the public good" by bringing in more tax revenue.
I VEHEMENTLY disagree with this, but it has been done repeatedly. There was a farm near here that was taken for the development of a golf course!
Use the press, use the press use the press. People are pretty sick of the little guy getting screwed right now, call the person who wrote the article and tell them no one had told you and you want the public to hear the other side.
Fight fight fight and at the very least hold out for the $$$