- Thread starter
- #501
We haven't heard much from John recently. We've kept in touch, but he's still running a business.
That company has changed/grown/shrunk/grown/shrunk over the 43? 44? years it's been around. The photo industry changed monumentally with the advent of digital photography. The company moved in 2007, and they didn't take the film processing machines to the new location. These were state of the art when new, probably over $250K for the three of them, at least, and that was pre-1990. C41 (color negative), E6 (slides), and B&W film.
The machines went into the dumpster. No one wanted them, because film was on its way to the dumpster too.
Now, they don't even do any wet process anymore, ie, photographic paper development in a darkroom/machine. It's all ink. Sigh. Excellent (ink) printing looks nice, but I can tell the difference between that and a photographic print made with a negative at a glance, and I usually prefer the photo, if the images are of equal quality.
It's like when photography came on the scene, and people wanted to compare it to paintings, I suppose. It took awhile for photography to be accepted. Plus ça change...
That company has changed/grown/shrunk/grown/shrunk over the 43? 44? years it's been around. The photo industry changed monumentally with the advent of digital photography. The company moved in 2007, and they didn't take the film processing machines to the new location. These were state of the art when new, probably over $250K for the three of them, at least, and that was pre-1990. C41 (color negative), E6 (slides), and B&W film.
The machines went into the dumpster. No one wanted them, because film was on its way to the dumpster too.
Now, they don't even do any wet process anymore, ie, photographic paper development in a darkroom/machine. It's all ink. Sigh. Excellent (ink) printing looks nice, but I can tell the difference between that and a photographic print made with a negative at a glance, and I usually prefer the photo, if the images are of equal quality.
It's like when photography came on the scene, and people wanted to compare it to paintings, I suppose. It took awhile for photography to be accepted. Plus ça change...