Scientific theary

Quote:
I miss Reptar!

I
love.gif
Rugrats.
 
Scientific theory? What does it matter! Silence of the mice, pretty good movie right?
 
I also agree with the preserved dino skin/scales. I saw that on the Discovery channel once. A woman paleontologist found preserved tissue along with the skin also. The tissue was viable too since it would retract when stretched out.

And here's a little biology lesson for ya:

FEATHERS are actually modified SCALES. From there I could go on about natural selection. Such as, a mutation occurred causing feathers to develop and those who inherited were probably able to withstand temperature changes better and/or escape/chase faster than those who didn't. Not to mention camouflage.
 
Quote:
No, feathers are NOT modified scales. I don't care what the textbooks teach. Scales are just an extension of the reptiless skin. Feathers are specially designed (yup, I went there) for the bird and come out of the skin.

Flesh could not survive millions of years and still be viable. That doesn't virtually disprove evolution, it just disproves it.
 
What did I say? I stated a fact!!! I didn't insult anyone, I didn't say anything mean. I don't stoop to that level. What possible reason could there be for deleting my post?!
 
Quote:
No, feathers are NOT modified scales. I don't care what the textbooks teach. Scales are just an extension of the reptiless skin. Feathers are specially designed (yup, I went there) for the bird and come out of the skin.

Flesh could not survive millions of years and still be viable. That doesn't virtually disprove evolution, it just disproves it.

I believe this is what I was talking about:

6 Parts





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7R4kCjpwdgs&feature=related
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom