- Thread starter
- #19,561
Prexactly.Weights are one measurement
Volume is another.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prexactly.Weights are one measurement
Volume is another.
Oh, I LOVE this word! May I borrow it?Prexactly.
Moulting seems to be way more traumatic that I would have ever guessed. My older girls are in varying stages of moulting and they do not want to leave the coop. The are eating and drinking normally, but if it weren't for the room service, they probably would not be eating as much.Reading the A&E threads and reading elsewhere there are other peoples chickens who are producing diarrhea when moulting.
Because we like with what we're comfortable?It's when trying to calculate feed ratios that I can't help wondering why everywhere doesn't use the metric system and stick to mass measurement; cups, bushels, ounces...
![]()
LOL I use a scale when baking/cooking new-to-me British recipes, (most everything is measured by weight.) but once I make something once or twice, I don't measure anything and don't need the recipe. There are so many things that I can't remember, but when cooking/baking it is like muscle memory takes over. LOLBecause we like with what we're comfortable?
I recall the big push for everyone and everything here in the US to convert to metric, early 1970s I think. Soda went from quart to liter, and all the metric equivalents were included on food labels. Beyond that, it never seemed to progress.
I don't need a scale in order to cook, which works for me.![]()
In a large part of Europe they use kilos and grams for weight. And liters (liquids) for volume. All metric. Even lengths (meter) and our money system is metric.It's when trying to calculate feed ratios that I can't help wondering why everywhere doesn't use the metric system and stick to mass measurement; cups, bushels, ounces...
![]()
The preparation methods matter a lot. According to Jo Robinson, Eating on the wild side 2013: 186-193 if you simmer dried beans until they're done and then let them soak in the cooking liquid for an additional hour, the beans reabsorb some of the nutrients from the cooking liquor. And dried beans that were soaked then cooked in a pressure cooker retained the most antioxidant activity, as well as cooked faster. And bizarrely, when dried beans are canned they become more nutritious (in contrast to fresh peas and beans). The heat of the canning process enhances their nutritional value, making canned beans among the most nutritious foods in the supermarket.I don't want the chickens to eat peas as such, I want them to get the nutrients, mainly amino acids, that the dried peas can supply. It's abount nutrition per 100 grams.
Yes, but peas or beans that are eaten and digested deliver more nutrients than peas or beans that are rejected or barely digested.The problem with cooking peas, beans etc is the heating reduces the nutrients in the foodstuff.
But not the calendar. It didn't catch on. It did however leave a legacy that makes the life of historians having to deal with documents from France in the period in question a REAL headacheAll metric. Even lengths (meter) and our money system is metric.