- Thread starter
- #20,491
Good quality spelt is expensive; any spelt is expensive come to that.I agree. Especially about things that are difficult to measure (or have yet to be identified and / or measured) being overlooked.
Just because we don't have an (accurate or inaccurate - another elephant in the room) nutrient profile for some natural foodstuff, it does not follow that it does not play an important role in the diet. Some contributors' dismissals of such food items, simply because they're variable or they don't fit in a formula, don't help anyone. A recent discussion on pasture/ grass comes to mind. I note the authors of that paper were surprised by how high the protein levels were for some of the herbage. But you have observed before that our chickens know there's something in grass that is good for them, and a spell of grazing after meals occurs like clockwork here. It's not just about the insect or animal protein to be found in pasture; they're eating blades of grass and they are selective about precisely which blades they want.
I imagine you have to pay quite a premium for spelt, if bags of flour in the supermarket are anything to go by. My birds are fine on ordinary feed wheat, which is relatively cheap. (For those not au fait with these labels, 'feed wheat' is whole wheat specifically grown as animal feed, or wheat that was intended for human consumption but was downgraded to animal feed around harvest for quality reasons; 'wheat feed' is a by-product of the milling industry, 'waste' channelled into animal feed, and consists of the part of the grain not wanted for human consumption; I don't use that.)
