Quote:
If it works for you and you're happy with it, go for it. Are there exceptions to the rule? Yes.
Even different strains of specific poultry breeds can have different dietary mineral needs.
Excess dietary calcium is a cumulative effect. Calcium isn't a poison and sometimes takes a long time to show indications.
I wasn't citing anecdotal information but data from actual scientific research in poultry nutrition.
I worked in the commercial feed industry and was responsible for the precise content of feed ingredients by automating commercial grower mills based on that research.
There have been cases of layer companies losing large numbers of POL pullets from beginning the layer ration a bit too early.
The following link lists 9 causes of thin shells or shell-less eggs.
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ps020
To look at calcium intake as a sole cause of poor shell quality is to look at excessive cloudy days as a sole cause of poor tomato production.
http://www.worldpoultry.net/background/egg-shell-quality-first-looks-count-9347.html
I'm not trying to be harsh but when information is given that ignores the science I feel obligated to put in my 2 cents worth.
You can take it with a grain of salt.
The problem was fixed with extra calcium, so that is what I stick with. If the girls don't want it they won't eat it. My advice was mostly given by seasoned poultry raisers, all of them said the diet was fine.