*sigh* I'm loosing my touch. (Warning: Hi-jacked by Em)

[Harli50]

-_- NOT fair....

 

[JD4570]

JD, you'd have to recuse (sp?) yourself; you have too much pre- knowledge of the case to be impartial.

Too true about pre- knowledge but someone needs to put these two over a knee if you know what I mean!

 

[JD4570]

-_- NOT fair....

Don't worry Harli, he'll calm down when he runs out of brownies, and Spook don't share.

 

[EmtheFishLady]

I will have you know...you cannot SPANK a QUEEN!

 

[JD4570]

Oops.....tee hee hee hee.

Sorry Em, wasn't thinking.

 

[Harli50]

its possible just you wont like the outcome of it.....

 

[sourland]

I will have you know...you cannot SPANK a QUEEN!

 

[Tanichca]

Can we throw her from a window and feed her carcass to wild dogs, as in the story of Jezebel? Or mayhaps we should lock her in a tower before off-with-her-head-ing her? Spanking is a very limiting option, methinks.

 

[Bunnylady]

Wow, already debating the sentence, and we haven't even had a trial? No wonder Spook got spooked! I wonder if he'll be wearing a sombrero the next time we hear from him?

But, let's not all lose our heads here. While I agree that hijackers can't be given free reign, hasn't she already been reined in a bit? Does anyone know if Em has hijacked any threads since the collar went on?

 

[sourland]

Can we throw her from a window and feed her carcass to wild dogs, as in the story of Jezebel? Or mayhaps we should lock her in a tower before off-with-her-head-ing her? Spanking is a very limiting option, methinks.

Tani, that's just a little over reactive - don't you think?

Off with her head.

Just kiddin'.