that doesn't look like a split to me--- but I've been reading that splits are usually where the primaries and secondaries grow in different directions...right??? Wrong?? LOL!!
All answers I want too!!

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that doesn't look like a split to me--- but I've been reading that splits are usually where the primaries and secondaries grow in different directions...right??? Wrong?? LOL!!
I posted links to the album and thread; the wings thread was buried in a general care and nutrition section; I moved it to the genetics and breeding section, so it should be easier to find.
Looking at the above photos, I think the "split" is because the axial feather is still growing in. I had a bird at a show once and the judge pointed it out that the axial was still growing in; you could see other feathers still growing in on other parts of its body, too. It is relatively easy when spreading the wing to pull far enough that they appear to split, but they do not.
Somehow I am missing some section in the club. I thought I had seen everything. Obviously not!!
That's the way I've always viewed this thread -A thread relating to the Silkie "breed" specifically and covering genetics and showing. I'm really thankful for this thread and wouldn't want it any other way. It's one of the few threads where people can ask "basic" and or challenging questions about their silkies and get an educated response (or at least an opinion) from an "expert". I guess I feel like everyone is always learning and we never know it all. When I was a school teacher, although I taught the same subjects year after year, I researched and discovered new things right along with my students. How many times do we read a post and realize we had been wrong in our way of judging our silkies or mixing the genetics or something.Actually the original starter of this thread was very general.
Actually the original starter of this thread was very general.
Quote: Maybe; Without actual hands on, it can be really difficult to tell. And I like to look at the bottom of the wing, too, not just the top.
Quote: Look under the wing and see if an axial feather is growing in--to me, at that age, I don;t see anything definitively wrong. Now maybe if I saw the bird in natural stance, I might start thinking differently.
Here is a photo of one of my splash at 5 mths. I thought I could see some streamers coming in on the right hand bird. A couple of months later she laid an egg. I would give your splash a little more time. It's stance does look girly to me.That's the way I've always viewed this thread -A thread relating to the Silkie "breed" specifically and covering genetics and showing. I'm really thankful for this thread and wouldn't want it any other way. It's one of the few threads where people can ask "basic" and or challenging questions about their silkies and get an educated response (or at least an opinion) from an "expert". I guess I feel like everyone is always learning and we never know it all. When I was a school teacher, although I taught the same subjects year after year, I researched and discovered new things right along with my students. How many times do we read a post and realize we had been wrong in our way of judging our silkies or mixing the genetics or something.
Anyway, I hope all of you more experienced silkie breeders won't abandon us newer silkie owners who are working from the bottom to someday have those "Drop Dead Gorgeous Show Silkies"!
And, a few ribbons to go with them!![]()
Also, I have a question about "streamers" for splash silkies. Do the streamers always come in, in a greyish/black feather? I'm trying to determine if these 2 splash are cockerels.
This is Cleo Patra, but if those are streamers than I guess it's Leo Pierre? He's very small and sweet so should make a great rooster in the BBS breeding pen.
![]()
Look under the wing and see if an axial feather is growing in--to me, at that age, I don;t see anything definitively wrong. Now maybe if I saw the bird in natural stance, I might start thinking differently.