Your supposition on toes is backwards. Too FEW toes can come from wrong incubation temps; I speculate that too many can also, but have noting to confirm that. The too few toes is discussed in Hutt, along with polydactyly expression varying dramatically. Hutt on Polydactyly the incubation is discussed at the bottom of the linked page; the entire Po discussion begins a couple of pages earlier.
Buff is a complicated phenotype that can be derived from several different genotypes. It can be based upon either the wheaten or brown/partridge e-allele. Wheaten-based buffs tend to have lighter skin, plumage and eyes, but to be clearer of black pigment in the plumage. Brown-based buffs tend to have richer plumage colouring, but with "smut," and darker skin and eyes. Brown-based ones tend to have properly coloured combs, while wheaten-based ones have combs that are too raspberry in colour. Chick down indicated some of the genes present in the bird, and if you are really good at recognizing the difference, they can tell you a lot about the bird's genetics. I am at best so-so at IDing the genes present, and the siamese-point markings don;t ring any bells. A photo might help. Quite frankly, I would actually post a separate thread with the photo asking for help identifying the genes present based upon the chick down. And I would not say it is a silkie--that may lose some of the genetic heavy-weights.
Honestly, your best way to get good buffs is to purchase an adult breeding pair or trio where you can see the actual birds and evaluate their quality. You may pay more initially, but at the rate you sound like you are going, you probably have already spent at least the same amount of $$$ with little to show for it.
Last edited:
When my membership went through, I was invited to join this group and I noticed that pretty much everyone there are active members and exhibit. It's great for fast answers or critiques. I assumed (ha.ha.) that it was related to the club.
