They really aint that hard as I raise wyandottes lolThank you for the response! That’s what I thought but I’ve heard that they can be difficult to sex.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They really aint that hard as I raise wyandottes lolThank you for the response! That’s what I thought but I’ve heard that they can be difficult to sex.
I'm not sure which hatchery my LFS orders from.. but it's not uncommon on hatchery stock.. as I've gotten them before as well. And yes they are still Wyandotte indeed just with the wrong comb type for the SOP. I bet it would make a difference in heat tolerance.But where do you get single-combed SLWs?
I saw a half-right explanation of rose comb & fertility, and a completely correct explanation of the genetics for single vs. rose comb.That entire comb type is a myth no where was that ever proven...
Um, sort of.Breeding only rose comb for several generations can cause slow sperm motility, and ultimately *can* reduce or eliminate fertility is the reason why some keep single combs in their stock.
That is simply not true in the slightest. You are more than welcome to read a paper that concludes this.That entire comb type is a myth no where was that ever proven...
And whoever wrote that conclusion has a typo:That is simply not true in the slightest. You are more than welcome to read a paper that concludes this.
"The studies done on comb type and its influence on behavior and fertility have shown that the comb genotype does indeed have an impact. Particularly in rose comb breeds, the gene for heterozygous rose comb is linked with poor reproductive ability. There are several factors that appear to contribute to this. RR males are less successful at courting females. They have a higher percentage of sterile matings, and have a much shorter duration of fertility. No difference was found in the fertility of RR females. From recent studies it appears that the biggest problem may be with sperm metabolism and motility, although the exact cause for low fertility in rose comb breeds has yet to be determined for certain." Source
Yeah that is bizarre. I liked the sources of it though and I think their logic is correct. I assume that was an accident! Perhaps it might be best then just to look at their sources to further research the trend but I am on your page that rose combs are linked infertility and that the wording is wrong.And whoever wrote that conclusion has a typo:
"the gene for heterozygous rose comb is linked with poor reproductive ability."
"Heterozygous" does not belong in that sentence, since the homozygotes are the ones with problems (as shown in the rest of that paragraph, and the studies recounted in the body of that paper.)
@Rhodebar Lover I see that you copied it exactly from the paper, so my criticism refers to the actual author of the paper. They really needed to proofread that!