I've seen Andalusians with tidy black lacing. But I've only seen Andalusians at shows; I hadn't realised they weren't all like that.
Having read Dr Carefoot's work I suppose I presumed that it was that they were homozygous E, Pg-Ml & Co as he suggested.
I hadn't realised that any of the restrictor genes were supposed to affect adult plumage of E/E birds.
Clearly Dr Carefoot thought columbian was part of the lace & said they were E (I'm not sure ER had been found at the time).
I usually think about things which don't seem to make sense until I can think of how it might possibly work. I'd guessed that, perhaps, the blue diluted the black but the presence of the restricting genes caused more eumelanin to be concentrated at the edges causing a laced effect. Well one has to think of something to try to make things make sense.
Now what confuses me is when the blue bird, with proper black lacing, is on ER or eb. How is it that the restrictors do not restrict the eumelanin to the edges of the feather?
For instance the Barnevelder is on eb with homozygous Pg-Ml & is also heavily melanised but it still has colour, albeit dark colour, between the black lacing & when the black is turned blue the colour remains colour? So how do they get the ground colour to remain blue on black laced eb birds? Is it because they're heavily melanised? And if so presumably they have more melanising genes than the barnevelders? Much the same of ER . Usually ER birds with Pg-Ml, Co &/or Db would be laced with a pheomelanin ground. So how exactly do they keep the ground colour blue?
Also.....when people say that all blue birds in US are 'laced' do they mean properly laced with the secondary pattern genes or do they just mean with the edging?