FWIW
I built my 10' by 16' Woods using the techniques illustrated in Chapter III. I was motivated by easy access to local millars and therefore access to lumber of whatever dimensions I wanted; I chose rough cut 2" by 3" for framing, 1" by 6" for boards and 1/2" by 2" for battens. I live in Canada and have 5 month winters characterized by lots of snow. The build and structure is more than sufficient for this climate.
If I were to build again I would replicate the 10' by 16' dimensions and then add whatever number of "houses" needed to accommodate desired flock size in the side by side manner illustrated on page 92. Woods' build technique is more than sufficient for a single storey building, is more economical and easier to construct than modern stick framing methods. Using board and batten rather than 4' by 8' sheets renders the argument about materials use efficiency moot. BTW 10' lengths for all materials results in very little wasted cut offs.
Good luck.
I built my 10' by 16' Woods using the techniques illustrated in Chapter III. I was motivated by easy access to local millars and therefore access to lumber of whatever dimensions I wanted; I chose rough cut 2" by 3" for framing, 1" by 6" for boards and 1/2" by 2" for battens. I live in Canada and have 5 month winters characterized by lots of snow. The build and structure is more than sufficient for this climate.
If I were to build again I would replicate the 10' by 16' dimensions and then add whatever number of "houses" needed to accommodate desired flock size in the side by side manner illustrated on page 92. Woods' build technique is more than sufficient for a single storey building, is more economical and easier to construct than modern stick framing methods. Using board and batten rather than 4' by 8' sheets renders the argument about materials use efficiency moot. BTW 10' lengths for all materials results in very little wasted cut offs.
Good luck.