- Jul 26, 2010
- 2,969
- 4
- 171
I think most people, it's not that they have weird ideas about where their food comes from, it's that they don't think about it and can't think about it. Close to 50% of the US grosses annually under 25k a year. Nearly 50% of US families are under or near the poverty line. That doesn't leave a lot of room for luxurious thinking. Thinking about organic food, healthy food, farm food, raising your own food - that is so far away that it's in another world.
About 80% of Americans are urban living. So they are pretty far away from the means of their food production. And I think most urban people making near the poverty line support a family or part of one.
No, they don't eat well. Yes, they can't even CONSIDER where their food comes from, how it's made or anything else. They just have to take what they can get the cheapest. MacDonald's? Too expensive. Rent a garden plot? With what? Supermarket? Where? And how? Good food is expensive.
So it's noodles, instant potatoes, chips, the cheapest white bread, sugary cereal, canned soups, canned ravioli, the cheapest possible items to fill kids up so they're not crying at night in their beds.
I don't believe at all, that some urban person near the poverty line really is going to benefit by knowing exactly when or how a rooster needs to be with hens to make eggs. I think it's a ridiculous concern.
I think it has far more to do with what's important to a group of chicken fanatics than what's going to be effective help to people most in need of help.
The only thing that is really important to me, is that people, within the very little latitude they have, can slightly adapt their food choices to a slightly more healthy diet. Change habits, change culture, change income? Probably not very quickly, but maybe a little change, maybe people are a little healthier.
Being able to prepare healthy foods isn't just about BUYING foods or buying different foods. It's about having cooking equipment, containers and space to store buiky foods, a safe, working stove, electric or gas service, and the energy and hope enough to try something different. That's a pretty tall order.
About 80% of Americans are urban living. So they are pretty far away from the means of their food production. And I think most urban people making near the poverty line support a family or part of one.
No, they don't eat well. Yes, they can't even CONSIDER where their food comes from, how it's made or anything else. They just have to take what they can get the cheapest. MacDonald's? Too expensive. Rent a garden plot? With what? Supermarket? Where? And how? Good food is expensive.
So it's noodles, instant potatoes, chips, the cheapest white bread, sugary cereal, canned soups, canned ravioli, the cheapest possible items to fill kids up so they're not crying at night in their beds.
I don't believe at all, that some urban person near the poverty line really is going to benefit by knowing exactly when or how a rooster needs to be with hens to make eggs. I think it's a ridiculous concern.
I think it has far more to do with what's important to a group of chicken fanatics than what's going to be effective help to people most in need of help.
The only thing that is really important to me, is that people, within the very little latitude they have, can slightly adapt their food choices to a slightly more healthy diet. Change habits, change culture, change income? Probably not very quickly, but maybe a little change, maybe people are a little healthier.
Being able to prepare healthy foods isn't just about BUYING foods or buying different foods. It's about having cooking equipment, containers and space to store buiky foods, a safe, working stove, electric or gas service, and the energy and hope enough to try something different. That's a pretty tall order.
Last edited: